Nuclear Power: Investment

Debate between Jonathan Davies and Lindsay Hoyle
Tuesday 10th June 2025

(1 week, 1 day ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I inform the House that the Government will make a statement later today to give an update on the middle east.

Jonathan Davies Portrait Jonathan Davies (Mid Derbyshire) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Today’s announcement that £2.5 billion will be invested in the small modular reactor programme is fantastic news for the country. It will help bring energy bills down, power homes and create jobs. It is amazing news for Derby, too, because the technology behind the SMRs has its roots in the technology developed at Rolls-Royce Submarines half a century ago. As the Government move forward with investment and delivery, and the Secretary of State approaches the contractual aspects, will he ensure that we build on what we have in Derby, such as the Nuclear Skills Academy, and the good jobs already there, so that we can grow opportunity for the wider region and the country as a whole?

Government Announcements

Debate between Jonathan Davies and Lindsay Hoyle
Monday 2nd June 2025

(2 weeks, 2 days ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am sure that criticism was not aimed at me for granting two UQs. The reason I have granted two UQS is that the Government did not come here first with the strategic defence review. If they had, we would not be having the UQs and there would be no pressure on time.

Jonathan Davies Portrait Jonathan Davies (Mid Derbyshire) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Trust, integrity and transparency must be the watchwords of our politics, but those principles were worn extremely thin under the previous Government. What steps is the Leader of the House taking to redouble our commitment to trust and integrity, because our constituents expect no less?