All 2 Debates between Justin Tomlinson and Maggie Throup

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Justin Tomlinson and Maggie Throup
Monday 1st July 2019

(4 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Justin Tomlinson Portrait Justin Tomlinson
- Hansard - -

I understand why the hon. Lady raises that question but, under DLA, only 15% of claimants actually got the highest rate of support, whereas the rate under PIP is now 31%. One of the key things is that 70% of DLA claimants were on lifetime awards, yet one in three claimants’ condition had significantly changed within 12 months and they would have been entitled to a different rate—predominantly a higher rate, rather than a lower rate—and we do not want people to miss out. That is why, under PIP, we are now spending an additional £6 billion a year to support some of the most vulnerable people in society.

Maggie Throup Portrait Maggie Throup (Erewash) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

There has recently been a noticeable increase in the number of my constituents in receipt of personal independence payment who, on reassessment, have had it stopped or reduced. Will my right hon. Friend agree to meet me to discuss this worrying trend and to see what we can do to sort it out?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Justin Tomlinson and Maggie Throup
Thursday 14th March 2019

(5 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Justin Tomlinson Portrait Justin Tomlinson
- Hansard - -

As has been extensively covered in several debates, we have allocated an additional £1.1 billion of transitional support. The recent uprating order included an additional £3 billion to support the uprating of the state pension, and we will continue to support pensioners of all genders.

Maggie Throup Portrait Maggie Throup (Erewash) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

What measures could be included in the draft Domestic Abuse Bill to ensure that parental responsibility does not override restraining orders, especially when partners have been convicted of coercive behaviour?