Debates between Kevin Foster and Lucy Allan during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation and Liability for Housing Standards) Bill

Debate between Kevin Foster and Lucy Allan
2nd reading: House of Commons
Friday 19th January 2018

(6 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Act 2018 View all Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Act 2018 Debates Read Hansard Text
Lucy Allan Portrait Lucy Allan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman is right: local authorities’ powers are not being enforced, and there is a reason for that. We need to do much more to ensure that local authorities do enforce them.

Kevin Foster Portrait Kevin Foster (Torbay) (Con)
- Hansard - -

The hon. Member for Warwick and Leamington (Matt Western) said that authorities needed more resources with which to enforce legislation. Torbay Council has used the powers that the Government have given it to levy fines of up to £30,000 in order to increase its housing enforcement team using money from those who abuse their tenants.

Lucy Allan Portrait Lucy Allan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am delighted to hear that Torbay is using these powers, and I urge my local authority, Telford and Wrekin, to follow its example.

Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill

Debate between Kevin Foster and Lucy Allan
2nd reading: House of Commons
Friday 1st December 2017

(6 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill 2017-19 View all Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill 2017-19 Debates Read Hansard Text
Kevin Foster Portrait Kevin Foster (Torbay) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Does my hon. Friend agree that the rapid growth of new towns makes it logical to have more regular reviews, every five years rather than every 10 years?

Lucy Allan Portrait Lucy Allan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is an interesting point. We are not taking into account the number of people who are coming to new towns such as my constituency, or, indeed, the number of people who will move into the houses that are being built and have almost been completed.

In my view, the so-called public consultation has been no such thing. The Boundary Commission is simply taking submissions from political parties that have gathered a great deal of local support and, in some cases, not so local support. They are lobbying for an outcome that supports the political objectives that benefit them. My constituency is a case in point. The situation is farcical: all the people who are sending submissions are politically connected, and they all want the constituency to grow significantly when it could stay as it is and be within the threshold. I cannot believe that any genuine members of the public would want to share their MP with a larger number of people.

Given that there will not be another general election until 2022, the Government have an opportunity to consider carefully whether to take this proposal off the table, go back to the drawing board and get it right for the future. Why wait until October 2018, find that the House does not want the proposals to go ahead, and then start thinking about how to correct the process? We need to update the position and redraw boundaries at some point, but we must get it right, and I think that, for all sorts of reasons, we have an opportunity to do that now.

I commend the hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton, and also the former Member of Parliament for North West Durham, who presented the same Bill for the same reasons last year. There is a lack of flexibility and a failure to recognise that MPs must care for all constituents, registered or not. We must give a voice to all our constituents, be they in affluent Tory shires or urban areas.