Caste: Equality Act 2010 Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Caste: Equality Act 2010

Lord Deben Excerpts
Monday 2nd February 2015

(9 years, 3 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, we are conscious of the delay in this matter. During the passage of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, when the need for explicit caste legislation was debated extensively, it was generally acknowledged that a full public consultation should be undertaken, not least because there was no general consensus on even basic concepts, such as a workable definition of caste itself. Because of a number of delays, there is no longer sufficient time before the election to put it through.

Lord Deben Portrait Lord Deben (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, my noble friend will remember that in those debates this House specifically refused to support the Government’s position and refused to accept the delay. We voted for a change in the law. We are now two years later and that change has not been implemented. The Government owe it to this House to say that they will implement it, and that any future Government made up of the two parties of this Government will also implement it.

Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I recognise the frustration around the Chamber over this matter. However, the debates during the final stages of the then Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill made clear that caste is a controversial and difficult issue, and that the Government would need to proceed carefully, involving public consultation. I believe that the Tirkey v Chandok case, which was unknown at the time those debates took place but which has potentially significant implications for the law in respect of caste and race discrimination, clearly illustrates the need for caution.