European Union: Trade Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Kinnock

Main Page: Lord Kinnock (Labour - Life peer)

European Union: Trade

Lord Kinnock Excerpts
Monday 28th November 2016

(7 years, 5 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Henley Portrait Lord Henley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I am not going to comment on what will be coming before the noble Lord and others sometime later this year. The noble Lord does not have to wait long—he does not even have to wait as long as Christmas before this wonderful Green Paper comes out. He can then peruse it and make his comments in due course.

Lord Kinnock Portrait Lord Kinnock (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, can the Minister not see the contradiction in his statement a few moments ago that “assurances”—I am quoting him—have been given to Nissan but that there is no “special deal”? Given that the need for assurances arises wholly and solely out of this country’s impending departure from the European Union and the single market, why do the Government feel so inhibited about publicising the assurances given so that they can be examined to see whether there is in fact a special deal which could be imparted to all the other companies that will be affected?

Lord Henley Portrait Lord Henley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I made clear that there was no compensation package to Nissan. My right honourable friend the Secretary of State made that clear and my noble friend made it clear when she repeated that Statement on 31 October and gave four assurances. There is not time for me to go through those four assurances, but I refer the noble Lord back to the debate that was held on 31 October, where he can read through them.