Energy: Nuclear Power Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan

Main Page: Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour - Life peer)

Energy: Nuclear Power

Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan Excerpts
Thursday 3rd June 2010

(13 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Marland Portrait Lord Marland
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the noble Lord very much. That is very reassuring.

Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan Portrait Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan
- Hansard - -

Will the Minister be a little more specific in his answer to my noble friend’s question relating to Sheffield Forgemasters? As chairman of the Nuclear Industry Association I should tell him that there is widespread concern across the industry not so much about the lack of government commitment but about the fact that they are not sending out the positive signals quickly enough. Evidence of that would be an early statement on the Sheffield Forgemasters’ loan. Will he give us a time by which such a statement will be given? Will it be at the end of this month, will it be before the Summer Recess, or will it be in this grand Statement that he has promised us? This is a specific issue on which action is required very early in order to enhance and reinforce the UK supply chain.

Lord Marland Portrait Lord Marland
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am very grateful to such an eminent expert in these areas for his question—which I felt was a little harsh. I thought that I was very clear in what I said about Sheffield Forgemasters. It is a matter for the Treasury, which is giving it due consideration and consultation. No doubt it will opine on the matter in the very near future. It is important that the matter is deliberately debated and that a decision of some consequence is made. This is not something to be frittered in the wind.