Energy Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Oxburgh

Main Page: Lord Oxburgh (Crossbench - Life peer)
Tuesday 19th November 2013

(10 years, 5 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
I hope that I have made that clear—I fear that I may not have done because it is very complicated. To put it in its simplest terms, the Bill is insufficiently clear on these definitions of what constitutes a station and we have tabled this amendment to address that. I hope that the Minister will be able to accept it. I beg to move.
Lord Oxburgh Portrait Lord Oxburgh (CB)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I support the amendment. The noble Baroness, Lady Worthington, is too modest. She has made it abundantly clear that clarity is needed in the legislation because, as the wording stands, simply part of an operating unit may be upgraded. I therefore hope that the Government can accept the amendment.

Lord Teverson Portrait Lord Teverson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I welcome the amendment because clarification is needed—and, indeed, I thought that the explanation given by the noble Baroness was very good. I would be very interested to hear the Government’s view on how this issue should be resolved, as it is clearly important for the way in which the industry moves forward.