Defence: Budget Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury

Defence: Budget

Lord Palmer of Childs Hill Excerpts
Tuesday 11th November 2014

(9 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Stowell of Beeston Portrait The Lord Privy Seal (Baroness Stowell of Beeston) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I am sorry for taking up time in the Chamber, but it is actually the turn of the noble Lord opposite.

Lord Newby Portrait Lord Newby
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I did read the Financial Times article. It is fair to say that all the parties going into the next election will have different views about how to bear down on the deficit. The Conservatives have one view and the Liberal Democrats have a different view as to where the balance between expenditure cuts and tax rises should fall. I have no idea what the Labour view is.

Lord Palmer of Childs Hill Portrait Lord Palmer of Childs Hill
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I want to be more specific. The Government’s original plan was to purchase 138 F-35B joint strike fighter aircraft. This was reduced to 48 and it has been further reduced to 19. How will this commitment be affected by budget requirements and how will budget requirements and the needs of the defence of the realm be balanced?

Lord Newby Portrait Lord Newby
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, at this stage of the Joint Strike Fighter programme, aircraft are being procured via a rolling programme of annual contracts which confirm customer requirements two years ahead of purchase. We will make further announcements on new contractual commitments in due course. The overall number of F-35 joint strike fighter aircraft to be purchased will not be determined before the next strategic defence and security review.