Military Equipment: Sales Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Tunnicliffe

Main Page: Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour - Life peer)

Military Equipment: Sales

Lord Tunnicliffe Excerpts
Wednesday 30th January 2019

(5 years, 3 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My noble friend makes an important point. The Official Secrets Act, as your Lordships will be aware, is a far-reaching piece of legislation designed to protect the national security of our country and its citizens. It is very easy to breach the provisions of that Act.

Lord Tunnicliffe Portrait Lord Tunnicliffe (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, according to the Times, officials had to go to this warehouse and physically inspect what was there. Does the MoD not have systems that track the whereabouts of sensitive equipment? If not, why not—or is this another example of the MoD cutting corners under budgetary pressures?

Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No, and I would not want any credence to be given to such an interpretation of the position. As I said, this is a situation where a respected defence contractor subcontracted a function to another company. That is not unusual in defence procurement contracts. What is important is that the proper protocols and standards are observed. As I indicated to the noble Lord, Lord West, where there is a List X category, companies have to comply with the security policy framework to ensure that they are protected appropriately under the List X clearance requirements. We are satisfied that Leonardo is discharging all its obligations in that respect.