Debates between Martin Docherty-Hughes and Bob Blackman during the 2019 Parliament

Wed 7th Sep 2022

Jagtar Singh Johal

Debate between Martin Docherty-Hughes and Bob Blackman
Thursday 19th January 2023

(1 year, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Martin Docherty-Hughes Portrait Martin Docherty-Hughes
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for giving way. We clearly have a bit of a disagreement. The Indian courts, the NIA and the police had five years to bring cases against my constituent for the charges against him, yet they have progressed only one of those, and even then, it was using evidence that was likely—whether the hon. Gentleman agrees with it or not—obtained using torture. Does he think it is time they actually brought a case to court and got on with it?

Bob Blackman Portrait Bob Blackman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Justice delayed is justice denied. I agree with the hon. Gentleman that this case should proceed in court as fast as possible. We have to remember that in India, the judiciary is impartial and is based on the UK model. We should also be clear that keeping Jagtar in prison for this length of time without bringing charges and without proper process, so that he can either answer those charges or, indeed, be found guilty of them, is unfair and unjust.

--- Later in debate ---
Bob Blackman Portrait Bob Blackman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I recognise what the hon. Lady says. One of the questions I have for the Minister is: can he confirm that Mr Singh has been given access to legal representation at all times?

Martin Docherty-Hughes Portrait Martin Docherty-Hughes
- Hansard - -

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Bob Blackman Portrait Bob Blackman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

This is vital, because if he has been denied legal representation, that is a denial of his human rights. Equally, has the high commission maintained contact with not only Mr Singh but the Indian authorities, to establish exactly what is going on?

--- Later in debate ---
Martin Docherty-Hughes Portrait Martin Docherty-Hughes
- Hansard - -

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Bob Blackman Portrait Bob Blackman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am posing questions for the Minister to answer because I genuinely want to hear what the view of the British Government is on these points. The key here is the actions of our high commission in representing not only the hon. Gentleman’s constituent but, importantly, a UK national.

Bob Blackman Portrait Bob Blackman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman suggests that this might be the case. We know that India—and we will be talking about Republic Day next week—faces a number of terrorist atrocities and terrorist attacks. We therefore have to be very careful when we are looking at what the Indian Government, the Indian police and their crime agencies are doing to combat that terrorism.

Martin Docherty-Hughes Portrait Martin Docherty-Hughes
- Hansard - -

In relation to the banned organisation of which the hon. Gentleman said my constituent was a member, he must remember that that so-called banned organisation was not banned until 2018, and my constituent was arrested in 2017. Rather than throwing accusations and aspersions without evidence, which would not stand in a court of law, does he agree that he should use his contacts in the Indian Government to ask them to bring forward witnesses and bring the case to court?

Bob Blackman Portrait Bob Blackman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It appears that the hon. Gentleman now accepts the fact that Mr Singh is a member of a banned organisation.

Martin Docherty-Hughes Portrait Martin Docherty-Hughes
- Hansard - -

No, I did not say that.

Bob Blackman Portrait Bob Blackman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Well, it seemed me that that is exactly what he was alluding to. The fact is that under Indian law, Mr Singh has the right to bring his case to the courts. The accusations of torture—which, of course, would be illegal under international law—should be listened to in the Indian courts, so he should bring that case to the Indian courts through his lawyers and legal representatives. That is vital.

Can my hon. Friend the Minister confirm that consular officers from the high commission have been granted access to Mr Singh more than 60 times during the duration of his arrest and detention? That means we are ensuring that the high commission is doing its job and that proper access and proper assistance is provided to our citizen, to ensure that we will eventually get to a conclusion of this case, however long it takes.

Jagtar Singh Johal

Debate between Martin Docherty-Hughes and Bob Blackman
Wednesday 7th September 2022

(1 year, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Urgent Questions are proposed each morning by backbench MPs, and up to two may be selected each day by the Speaker. Chosen Urgent Questions are announced 30 minutes before Parliament sits each day.

Each Urgent Question requires a Government Minister to give a response on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Bob Blackman Portrait Bob Blackman (Harrow East) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I congratulate the hon. Member for West Dunbartonshire (Martin Docherty-Hughes) on pursuing this case on behalf of his constituent. He has been assiduous in pursuing justice for Jagtar Singh Johal. I will come back to the plight of Jagtar Singh Johal rather than the case against the Government. I understand that he is a member of the Khalistani Liberation Force, which is a proscribed organisation in India. Indeed, at the moment he is facing up to eight charges of murder or attempted murder. Will my hon. Friend ensure that consular assistance is provided to him so that he gets a fair trial, and then we can deal with the issues that result?

Martin Docherty-Hughes Portrait Martin Docherty-Hughes
- Hansard - -

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker.