Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Neil Hudson and Lindsay Hoyle
Thursday 24th November 2022

(1 year, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Neil Hudson Portrait Dr Neil Hudson (Penrith and The Border) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I, many constituents and countless people up and down the land struggle each week with the poor and unreliable service provided by Avanti West Coast. People are missing interviews, appointments, family events and social occasions. Can the Minister give the latest Government assessment of Avanti’s performance and confirm that nothing will be ruled out, including stripping it of its contract if it does not lift its game?

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is dreadful at the moment. Come on, Minister.

BBC Local Radio: Proposed Reduction in Provision

Debate between Neil Hudson and Lindsay Hoyle
Tuesday 1st November 2022

(1 year, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We have saved the best until last. I call Dr Neil Hudson from Cumbria.

Neil Hudson Portrait Dr Neil Hudson (Penrith and The Border) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I share the concerns raised by hon. Members on both sides of the House and by the Minister about these retrograde proposals. In rural areas such as Cumbria, people rely on local radio stations such as BBC Radio Cumbria and on terrestrial TV. They provide a lifeline for news and education, mitigate against rural isolation and support people’s rural mental health. Does she agree that we should resist such reductions and that, in fact, we should bolster and support such vital services?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Neil Hudson and Lindsay Hoyle
Thursday 28th April 2022

(2 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Neil Hudson Portrait Dr Neil Hudson (Penrith and The Border) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I was recently humbled to be able to attend a vigil for peace organised by the Penrith and Eden Refugee Network and local churches. Will my hon. Friend join me in thanking churches, faith groups and community groups in my constituency and across the country for all that they are doing to support the people of Ukraine and refugees through prayer groups, vigils, and donations of supplies and financial aid?

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. I am sorry, but the question is not relevant. Unfortunately, questions must be linked to the main question. Refugees: go on, Andrew, have a go at it.

Continuity Trade Agreements: Parliamentary Scrutiny

Debate between Neil Hudson and Lindsay Hoyle
Tuesday 17th November 2020

(3 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Urgent Questions are proposed each morning by backbench MPs, and up to two may be selected each day by the Speaker. Chosen Urgent Questions are announced 30 minutes before Parliament sits each day.

Each Urgent Question requires a Government Minister to give a response on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We have a bad connection with Marion Fellows—we have tech problems—so we are going to go to Dr Neil Hudson.

Neil Hudson Portrait Dr Neil Hudson (Penrith and The Border) (Con) [V]
- Hansard - -

I am pleased that the Government have strengthened the Trade and Agriculture Commission, announced more robust parliamentary scrutiny of trade deals and provided reassurance that products such as hormone-treated beef and chlorine-washed chicken will remain banned in the UK. Does my right hon. Friend agree that writing specific unacceptable products such as those, and others such as ractopamine-fed pork, the excessive use of microbials and the use of growth promoters, into specific chapters in trade deals would be a practical way of ensuring that high standards are encouraged globally? Does he agree that such an approach would make it clear to both parties in trade deals that those products are not going to be traded, allowing other, acceptable products to be encouraged and therefore driving up animal welfare standards globally?