Points of Order Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Paul Flynn

Main Page: Paul Flynn (Labour - Newport West)
Monday 17th October 2011

(12 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
David Winnick Portrait Mr David Winnick (Walsall North) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On a point of order, Mr Speaker. Things have certainly moved on since last Monday, when the then Defence Secretary made a statement to the House. There has been a great deal of comment, and reports in the press, about various individuals and United States-based companies that were apparently involved with the individual who described himself at the time as the adviser to the Defence Secretary.

In view of the undoubtedly serious matters and allegations involving the Ministry of Defence, will the House have an opportunity to hear a statement? We heard a statement last Monday, but we have not heard one since, and these are very serious allegations.

Paul Flynn Portrait Paul Flynn (Newport West) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Further to that point of order, Mr Speaker.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will take it, and then respond to the hon. Member for Walsall North (Mr Winnick).

Paul Flynn Portrait Paul Flynn
- Hansard - -

During business questions last week, the House was reminded of the promise the present Prime Minister made shortly before the election that the most serious threat to the reputation of the House—after MPs’ expenses—was the possibility of abuse of our procedures by big corporate lobbyists. Sadly, the Government have taken no action to ensure that some control is exercised over the affairs of lobbyists, and there is now abundant evidence that that is an urgent priority.

Angela Eagle Portrait Ms Angela Eagle (Wallasey) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Further to that point of order, Mr Speaker. Have Ministers informed you that they will come to the House to make a statement on that report before releasing it to the media?