Concessionary Television Licences Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Peter Heaton-Jones

Main Page: Peter Heaton-Jones (Conservative - North Devon)

Concessionary Television Licences

Peter Heaton-Jones Excerpts
Monday 6th July 2015

(8 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
John Whittingdale Portrait Mr Whittingdale
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree with my hon. Friend. It is time that we had a thorough review of every aspect of the BBC’s activities. That is the precise purpose of the charter review that we are shortly to embark upon.

Peter Heaton-Jones Portrait Peter Heaton-Jones (North Devon) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Speaking as a former long-term inmate of the BBC, I wonder whether the Secretary of State agrees that the most important thing is to ensure that the licence fee is fit for purpose in the 21st century and, in particular, to close down the iPlayer loophole. We must encourage the BBC to continue to make efficiency savings because, as I saw for myself, great swathes of middle management could be cut tomorrow and “EastEnders” would still start at half past 7.

John Whittingdale Portrait Mr Whittingdale
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree with my hon. Friend on both points. On the iPlayer loophole, the original conception of the licence fee was that those who enjoyed watching television should pay a licence fee from which the BBC would be funded. Of course, at that time, the opportunity to view catch-up television did not exist, but I think those who created the licence fee would have thought that it should apply equally to those watching catch-up and those watching live TV. It is merely to reassert that principle that the Government have agreed to change the law so that catch-up TV is treated in exactly the same way as live TV in respect of the requirement to pay the licence fee.