Justice and Security Bill [Lords] Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Justice and Security Bill [Lords]

Rory Stewart Excerpts
Monday 4th March 2013

(11 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Clarke of Nottingham Portrait Mr Clarke
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We have taken notice of it, but I do not understand why special advocates seem to be taking up the arguments of people who say that we should never allow anybody to consider the evidence in question. I never thought that PIIs were a perfect process, but the critics have suddenly decided they are now that we have brought forward CMPs. If there is a PII, the judge cannot take account of such evidence, claimants and the defence cannot use it, and the lawyers do not know about it. That is held up to me as a superior position to the one we are putting forward, which will mean that the judge can consider that evidence.

Rory Stewart Portrait Rory Stewart (Penrith and The Border) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Will the Minister tell us in broad terms what concessions he has made since the Bill was conceived, and whether there are any further concessions that he can make to address any concerns?

Lord Clarke of Nottingham Portrait Mr Clarke
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I was about to move on to that point, having made the general case. Every time I make concessions, they are pocketed and there is a fresh set of demands. I have known that to happen before, but never on the same scale as with this Bill. I will try to explain that when I get on to the matter.