Local Government Funding: Rural Areas Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Sarah Wollaston

Main Page: Sarah Wollaston (Liberal Democrat - Totnes)

Local Government Funding: Rural Areas

Sarah Wollaston Excerpts
Monday 11th January 2016

(8 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Graham Stuart Portrait Graham Stuart
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Absolutely. It is a worry. The distribution of funds becomes more important, not less, during a period of flat or reduced expenditure. It is a bit like when the sea goes out and all the undulations—the inequities—are suddenly exposed. That is what happens during a period of sustained control over public finances, which Conservative Members recognise as being inevitable following the economic wreckage that was left behind by the Labour party.

Sarah Wollaston Portrait Dr Sarah Wollaston (Totnes) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I thank my hon. Friend for his magnificent campaign. Does he agree that we must dispel the myth that there is no deprivation in rural areas, and make it clear that people in those areas are doubly disadvantaged by the lack of access to services such as transport?

Graham Stuart Portrait Graham Stuart
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. Withernsea, a town in my constituency, is among the 10% most deprived areas in the country, and I know that similar stories can be told about colleagues’ constituencies throughout England. It is not true that there is no deprivation in rural areas. On average, it is not true. On average, the urban resident receives more. Urban areas do not consist of the most deprived, concentrated communities. They contain some communities of that kind, but on average people in urban areas earn a great deal more than those in rural areas.