Housing Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Stephen McPartland

Main Page: Stephen McPartland (Conservative - Stevenage)

Housing

Stephen McPartland Excerpts
Wednesday 8th January 2014

(10 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Hilary Benn Portrait Hilary Benn
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend makes a good point about the nature of the land market, why reform is required and why that is one thing we have asked Sir Michael Lyons to look at in his work.

The next problem the Government should start looking at is the difficulty faced by local authorities in places such as Stevenage, Oxford, Luton and York, which want to see houses built to meet demand but do not have the land and neighbouring authorities are not co-operating and making that happen. Ministers recognise that there is a problem, because that is why they put the duty to co-operate in the national planning policy framework.

Stephen McPartland Portrait Stephen McPartland (Stevenage) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way? On Stevenage?

Hilary Benn Portrait Hilary Benn
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will give way.

Stephen McPartland Portrait Stephen McPartland
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman for giving way on the issue of Stevenage, where he went with some of Labour colleagues, without informing me, to launch their housing policy. Is he aware that Labour-controlled Stevenage borough council has still not asked neighbouring North Hertfordshire district council whether it will have any houses required in its local plan, because Stevenage borough council believes it can meet its need within its own administrative boundaries?

Hilary Benn Portrait Hilary Benn
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

What the hon. Gentleman has just said absolutely does not square with what the leader of Stevenage borough council has said to me—

Hilary Benn Portrait Hilary Benn
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Excuse me. It also does not square with the figures that I have looked at on the proposals for development to the north of Stevenage, which have been consistently blocked. The truth is that a duty to co-operate is not a duty to help each other out or to reach agreement. So in those circumstances, what is a council supposed to do? That shows why the right to grow would provide a means of overcoming this problem by requiring neighbouring local authorities to work together to ensure that the houses that need to be built are built. It is not a top-down—

Stephen McPartland Portrait Stephen McPartland
- Hansard - -

On a point of order—

Hilary Benn Portrait Hilary Benn
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is no good asking me for a point of order.

Baroness Primarolo Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Dawn Primarolo)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No it is not. You are quite right, Mr Benn. I was just about to call Mr McPartland to make his point of order.

Stephen McPartland Portrait Stephen McPartland
- Hansard - -

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. The right hon. Gentleman has just made an accusation about Stevenage. I would just like to clarify things to the House, and I wonder whether that is in order.

--- Later in debate ---
Emma Reynolds Portrait Emma Reynolds
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will not give way again to the same person.

Finally, the Government are in complete denial about the situation of towns and cities such as Stevenage, Oxford and Luton—which my hon. Friend the Member for Luton South (Gavin Shuker) spoke eloquently about—where local communities are crying out for new homes but neighbouring local authorities are blocking them every step of the way. The Government introduced the duty to co-operate, but they must accept that those fine words are not translated into action. Half a million pounds has been paid out to lawyers in Stevenage over the dispute with North Hertfordshire. I would rather that money was spent on bricks and mortar.

Emma Reynolds Portrait Emma Reynolds
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am running out of time and I think the hon. Gentleman had a chance to intervene on my right hon. Friend the Member for Leeds Central (Hilary Benn). In conclusion, in order to boost the number of homes being built, crucially we need leadership from both central Government and local government. Regrettably, this Government are failing to step up to the plate. Warm words are simply not good enough and our constituents deserve better. Other countries manage to get this right and it should not be beyond us to do so too. That is why I urge all right hon. and hon. Members to support tonight’s motion.

Kris Hopkins Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Kris Hopkins)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

May I first offer my condolences to the family of Paul Goggins? When I was appointed to this position, he very kindly welcomed me. He was generous in the way that he approached many Members across the House, and he was passionate about housing too. I put on record my condolences to his family and friends.

This is a valuable and important debate. Like the Secretary of State, I congratulate the Opposition on securing their second debate on housing since 2010. The Leader of the Opposition says that housing is an important part of their agenda, but to have secured only two Opposition day debates in that time does not demonstrate the passion that his party claims it has for housing. The debate gives us an opportunity to remind the House and the country of the mess left by the previous Labour Government, and of the Opposition’s preference for old, top-down diktats by which they tell the country what to do, and tell councils and local people what they should be doing and where they should be living.

Stephen McPartland Portrait Stephen McPartland
- Hansard - -

Will the Minister give way?

Kris Hopkins Portrait Kris Hopkins
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

By all means.

Stephen McPartland Portrait Stephen McPartland
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for giving way. Does he agree that the right to grow policy, which Labour launched in my Stevenage constituency without telling me in advance, is already in tatters? Stevenage borough council’s published draft local plan makes no reference whatever to the need for additional housing in North Hertfordshire district council. There have been no representations made between the offices of the two different authorities, and North Hertfordshire is currently doing its local plan.

Kris Hopkins Portrait Kris Hopkins
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

If it is the case that those representations have not been made, my hon. Friend may want to write to the Prime Minister. If that was my local council and my neighbouring council was going to raid my green belt and green spaces to facilitate housing in a neighbouring council, I would imagine that, like my hon. Friend, I would be extremely unhappy.

Despite the Opposition’s claims, it was under the previous Administration that house building fell to its lowest peacetime rate since the 1920s, with only 107,000 homes completed in 2010. They imposed regional targets on local communities as part of their top-down regime. Their approach is that Whitehall and Labour know better. The complete failure to invest between 1997 and 2010 resulted, as has been said, in some 427,000 fewer social houses. Under this Government, come 2015 there will be more social housing—something that Members recognise—and we can be extremely proud of that. In contrast to Labour’s record, we have given people local control of neighbourhood planning, as my hon. Friend the Member for Stevenage (Stephen McPartland) has just said. I encourage local authorities that have not completed their local plan to get on with it, to engage with their local communities and give power to local individuals to shape their community, and to remove red tape.