To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
A17: East Midlands
Thursday 30th June 2016

Asked by: Stephen Phillips (Conservative - Sleaford and North Hykeham)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what plans he has to dual the A17 between Newark and Sleaford.

Answered by Andrew Jones

The A17 forms part of the local road network and is the responsibility of Lincolnshire County Council and Nottinghamshire County Council. Responsibility for maintenance of the road rests with the relevant Local Highway Authority. Plans for future improvement and requests for funding are matters for the relevant Local Highway Authorities to put forward to their relevant Local Enterprise Partnerships.
Written Question
Department for Transport: Data Protection
Friday 5th February 2016

Asked by: Stephen Phillips (Conservative - Sleaford and North Hykeham)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 28 January 2016 to Question 23487, which external consultants or other third parties were responsible for the eight breaches there identified.

Answered by Robert Goodwill

2 cases were reported by Shared Services Arvato

2 cases were reported by GBGroup plc

2 cases were reported by Pearson

1 case was reported by Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA)

1 case was reported by Civil Service Resourcing who reported non-receipt of documents from the sender.


Written Question
Department for Transport: Data Protection
Friday 5th February 2016

Asked by: Stephen Phillips (Conservative - Sleaford and North Hykeham)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 28 January 2016 to Question 23487, of the eight breaches there identified, how many concerned documents within each of the following categories applicable prior to April 2014, namely (a) top secret, (b) secret, (c) confidential, (d) restricted, (e) protected and (f) unclassified; and how many breaches concerned documents within each of the following categories applicable from April 2014, namely (i) top secret, (ii) secret and (iii) official-sensitive or official.

Answered by Robert Goodwill

Of the eight breaches reported pursuant to the answer of 28 January 2016 to Question 23487 none of them concerned documents prior to April 2014

Since April 2014;

  • 6 cases concerned OFFICIAL or OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE documents
  • 2 cases did not involve documents

Written Question
Aviation: South China Sea
Thursday 28th January 2016

Asked by: Stephen Phillips (Conservative - Sleaford and North Hykeham)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether his Department is aware of any occasion since 2010 on which the government of the People's Republic of China has sought to limit or exclude civilian aircraft registered in the UK from exercising freedom of navigation or passage rights over disputed areas of the South China Sea by that government.

Answered by Robert Goodwill

The Department for Transport is not aware of any occasion since 2010 on which the government of the People's Republic of China has sought to limit or exclude civilian aircraft registered in the UK from flying over any area of the South China Sea.


Written Question
Department for Transport: Data Protection
Thursday 28th January 2016

Asked by: Stephen Phillips (Conservative - Sleaford and North Hykeham)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, on how many occasions his Department has been notified by external consultants or other third parties of breaches by employees or subcontractors of those consultants of document retention or security policies relating to confidential or secure materials in each of the last two years.

Answered by Robert Goodwill

The Department does not hold a comprehensive central record of the information requested. From records in the central Department and each of its executive agencies, the following number of breaches were notified by external consultants or other third parties:

  • 2014 – 3
  • 2015 – 5

Written Question
A17: Dual Carriageways
Friday 20th November 2015

Asked by: Stephen Phillips (Conservative - Sleaford and North Hykeham)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the economic benefits of (a) dualling the A17 in its entirety and (b) dualling its single carriageway sections.

Answered by Andrew Jones

No assessment has been undertaken by the Department for Transport of the economic benefits of dualling the A17 in its entirety or in single sections. The A17 forms part of the local road network and is the responsibility of Lincolnshire County Council and Nottinghamshire County Council. It is for the councils concerned to develop proposals to dual this road if they wish to do so, working closely with the respective Local Enterprise Partnerships.


Written Question
Channel Tunnel Railway Line
Tuesday 21st July 2015

Asked by: Stephen Phillips (Conservative - Sleaford and North Hykeham)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the contribution of 14 January 1994 by the then Minister for Public Transport, Official Report, column 432, on Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Compensation), what conclusion the Government drew from its consideration of legal advice commissioned by local authorities.

Answered by Claire Perry

Following the House of Commons Select Committee on the Channel Tunnel Rail Link (CTRL) Bill, an interdepartmental working group on blight (IDWGB) was established to review the impact of blight during major infrastructure projects. The Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions published the final report of the IDWGB in 1997. This report is in the public domain. The report recommended, amongst other things, the creation of a Property Purchase Guarantee and Compensation Scheme, although this was not adopted by the government of the day.


Written Question
Large Goods Vehicles
Wednesday 25th June 2014

Asked by: Stephen Phillips (Conservative - Sleaford and North Hykeham)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps he is taking with his European counterparts to encourage the reduction of fuel consumption by heavy-duty vehicles across the EU.

Answered by Robert Goodwill

We are committed to reducing the fuel consumption of heavy duty vehicles. We continue to work closely with both the UK industry and our European counterparts to ensure that the recently published EU Strategy for improving heavy duty vehicle fuel consumption and reducing CO2 emissions reflects UK interests, and is ambitious but deliverable, proportionate and cost effective.


Written Question
Unmanned Air Vehicles
Thursday 12th June 2014

Asked by: Stephen Phillips (Conservative - Sleaford and North Hykeham)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps his Department is taking to facilitate the integration of remotely piloted aircraft systems into UK civil airspace.

Answered by Robert Goodwill

The Department for Transport leads on policy for the operation of civil remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) in the UK. We are working with international Governments, regulators and the industry – including the European Commission and International Civil Aviation Organization – on the development of regulation for the safe integration of RPAS into UK and European airspace.

The UK Civil Aviation Authority and the European Aviation Safety Agency have a statutory responsibility to deal with the detailed Regulation.

In addition, the Department for Transport currently chairs the cross-Government Working Group on RPAS and sits on the Autonomous Systems Technology Related Airborne Evaluation & Assessment Steering Board, which both seek to enable the safe and routine use of RPAS in all classes of airspace without the need for restrictive or specialised conditions of operation. This will be achieved through the coordinated development and demonstration of key technologies and operating procedures.