To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Pylons: Lincolnshire
Monday 19th October 2026

Asked by: Steve Barclay (Conservative - North East Cambridgeshire)

Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero:

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether there will be increases to the projected costs of the Grimsby to Walpole project.

Answered by Michael Shanks - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)

Ofgem assesses electricity transmission investment through its price control framework and decides the efficient costs that can be recovered from consumers. The Government does not assess project costs.

Network companies must manage cost pressures and justify any proposed expenditure or changes to Ofgem, who scrutinises these costs and considers them alongside the benefits of investment, including increased network capacity and lower constraint costs.

The Government and Ofgem are committed to ensuring that the investment needed for a secure, reliable and clean electricity system is delivered at the lowest reasonable cost to consumers. This approach supports timely delivery while maintaining rigorous regulatory oversight.


Division Vote (Commons)
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Steve Barclay (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 115
Division Vote (Commons)
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Steve Barclay (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 102 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 114
Division Vote (Commons)
14 Oct 2026 - Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - View Vote Context
Steve Barclay (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 115
Division Vote (Commons)
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Unions - View Vote Context
Steve Barclay (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 115
Division Vote (Commons)
14 Oct 2026 - Inheritance Tax - View Vote Context
Steve Barclay (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 291
Division Vote (Commons)
14 Oct 2026 - MOD Bicester and Illegal Migrants - View Vote Context
Steve Barclay (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 100 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 309
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
Steve Barclay (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 99 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 193
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
Steve Barclay (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 98 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 304
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
Steve Barclay (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 306