Oral Answers to Questions

Tim Loughton Excerpts
Tuesday 10th November 2015

(8 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Tim Loughton Portrait Tim Loughton (East Worthing and Shoreham) (Con)
- Hansard - -

10. What assessment he has made of the adequacy of further education provision and funding in Sussex.

Nick Boles Portrait The Minister for Skills (Nick Boles)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

An area review—the Sussex coast review of post-16 education and training—is taking place and it will recommend high-quality, sustainable and financially viable further education and sixth-form colleges through a reformed structure.

Tim Loughton Portrait Tim Loughton
- Hansard - -

Two FE colleges in my constituency—Worthing college and Northbrook college—are part of that review. They are good and improving colleges, providing valuable apprenticeships, training and education. They have already taken large cuts—there is much uneconomic provision—so can the Minister assure me that the area reviews are not just a cover for further, unrealistic cuts that will threaten their viability altogether? Why are sixth forms in schools not included in those reviews?

Nick Boles Portrait Nick Boles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am glad to have an opportunity to reassure my hon. Friend. Regional school commissioners are absolutely required to be part of the area reviews. Those in some parts of the country have perhaps been surprised by that requirement, so I am happy to reassert it: they are employed by the Department for Education and are required to be part of those area reviews. The point of area reviews is to have strong, sustainable FE and sixth-form colleges that can take advantage of growing revenue streams such as the funding for apprenticeships.