Draft Electric Vehicles (Smart Charge Points) Regulations 2021

Debate between Trudy Harrison and Kevan Jones
Wednesday 8th December 2021

(2 years, 4 months ago)

General Committees
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Trudy Harrison Portrait Trudy Harrison
- Hansard - -

I fear that we strayed considerably from the technical aspects. As interesting as it was, I recommend that those interested perhaps attend Westminster Hall debates for a comprehensive discussion on the wider aspects of EV charging.

To respond to some questions, the regulatory requirements are aligned with the British standard for energy smart appliances PAS 1878 and build on relevant existing international and European standards. I am more than happy to write to the right hon. Member for North Durham with a comprehensive response on the cyber-security aspects.

On charging, there are 26,000 publicly available charge points, of which 4,900 are rapid chargers. We know more needs to be done, but we are working with local authorities, and I encourage Members across the House to work with me to help their local authorities roll out the necessary charge point infrastructure, which must match, as the hon. Member for Wythenshawe and Sale East said, the considerable interest in electric vehicles.

The draft regulations are an essential step in ensuring the success uptake of electric vehicles and, therefore, the decarbonisation of transport. They are particularly about the technical capability to take part in smart charging and assist with managing the electricity system, while saving money on energy bills. This is the first step.

Kevan Jones Portrait Mr Jones
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the Minister give way?

Trudy Harrison Portrait Trudy Harrison
- Hansard - -

I am afraid I will not, because I know votes are imminent. Work will continue so that consumers can fully access smart benefits and participate in the transition to a flexible system.

Kevan Jones Portrait Mr Jones
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On a point of order, Mr Robertson. I thought the purpose of scrutiny was to ask questions that the Minister responds to. She is just reading out the civil service brief in front of her, which is not good enough.

None Portrait The Chair
- Hansard -

It is not for me to decide what the Minister says.