House of Lords (Peerage Nominations) Bill [HL] Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateViscount Waverley
Main Page: Viscount Waverley (Crossbench - Excepted Hereditary)Department Debates - View all Viscount Waverley's debates with the Cabinet Office
(2 years, 11 months ago)
Lords Chamber Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Con)
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Con) 
        
    
        
    
        I thank the noble Baroness for making that point. Of course, as she says, the new Prime Minister becomes accountable to the monarch for putting forward the names of Peers in the future, taking into account the advice of HOLAC. The same is true of any further Dissolution List that may come from the other former Prime Minister.
 Viscount Waverley (CB)
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Viscount Waverley (CB) 
        
    
        
    
        I thank the Minister, to whom I apologise for intervening. Is she able to say with any greater degree of certainty that the Prime Minister has been consulted on the measures put forward today?
 Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Con)
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Con) 
        
    
        
    
        No. 10 and the Prime Minister are aware that we have had three days of useful discussion on these subjects: we have had two Questions and we now have this Bill. As I said at the very beginning, the new Government will be looking at the proceedings today, and they will reflect on what the House has to say.