Apr. 23 2024
Source Page: Food Data Transparency Partnership: agri-food environmental dataFound: Food Data Transparency Partnership: agri-food environmental data
Oral Evidence Apr. 23 2024
Inquiry: UK trade policy: food and agricultureFound: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Department for Business and Trade, and Department
Found: Research Service briefing on US sanctions, they: • Ban most US trade and investment with Iran (except food
Report Apr. 23 2024
Committee: European Scrutiny CommitteeFound: It also includes alterations intended to improve food information to consumers, reduce food waste, and
Mentions:
1: Andrew Stephenson (Con - Pendle) This includes restricting the placements of less healthy products in shops and online, calorie labelling - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Mark Spencer (Con - Sherwood) That, in turn, helps to protect our food chain.Veterinary medicines are necessarily highly regulated - Speech Link
2: Mark Spencer (Con - Sherwood) Changes will also enable common labelling and packaging to be used across the UK. - Speech Link
3: Daniel Zeichner (Lab - Cambridge) the requirements in EU law…This further reduces the current levels of UK-EU divergence in relation to labelling - Speech Link
4: Mark Spencer (Con - Sherwood) We want to align with the EU to make things as simple as possible for our food producers, but to maintain - Speech Link
Apr. 22 2024
Source Page: The Health Claims (Revocation) Regulations 2024Found: nutri tion and health claims made on foods governs the regulation of the use of health claims on food
Written Evidence Apr. 22 2024
Inquiry: Intergovernmental Relations: The Civil ServiceFound: range of senior official working groups as part of the individual framework structures, such as the Food
Apr. 22 2024
Source Page: Quality Prescribing Strategy for Respiratory A Guide for Improvement 2024-2027Found: the sink or flushed down the toilet, increase the risk of environmental harm and may enter the human food
Asked by: Alyn Smith (Scottish National Party - Stirling)
Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of introducing Not for EU labelling on trends in consumer behaviour in the purchase of agricultural products from UK-based businesses.
Answered by Mark Spencer - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
Labelling is a proportionate and necessary means of ensuring goods moving under the unique arrangements provided by the Windsor Framework are not being moved inappropriately into the EU.
We are not aware of any change in consumer behaviour based on the labelling requirements in place so far, which already sees those labels on products on shelves across the UK in practice. That reflects that the ‘not-for-EU’ label does not represent a change in standards of production and quality and is simply a means of ensuring the smooth movement of goods within the UK.