All 1 contributions to the Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill 2016-17 (Ministerial Extracts Only)

Read Full Bill Debate Texts

Fri 18th Nov 2016

Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill

(Limited Text - Ministerial Extracts only)

Read Full debate
2nd reading: House of Commons
Friday 18th November 2016

(9 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill 2016-17 Read Hansard Text

This text is a record of ministerial contributions to a debate held as part of the Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill 2016-17 passage through Parliament.

In 1993, the House of Lords Pepper vs. Hart decision provided that statements made by Government Ministers may be taken as illustrative of legislative intent as to the interpretation of law.

This extract highlights statements made by Government Ministers along with contextual remarks by other members. The full debate can be read here

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

13:33

Division 85

Question accordingly agreed to.

Ayes: 257


Labour: 214
Scottish National Party: 30
Conservative: 4
Liberal Democrat: 4
Independent: 2
Social Democratic & Labour Party: 2
Democratic Unionist Party: 1
Green Party: 1

Noes: 35


Conservative: 35

Question put accordingly, That the Bill be now read a Second time.
--- Later in debate ---
13:46

Division 86

Question accordingly agreed to.

Ayes: 253


Labour: 211
Scottish National Party: 30
Liberal Democrat: 4
Conservative: 2
Independent: 2
Social Democratic & Labour Party: 2
Democratic Unionist Party: 1
Green Party: 1
Plaid Cymru: 1

Noes: 37


Conservative: 36
UK Independence Party: 1

Bill accordingly read a Second time; to stand committed to a Public Bill Committee (Standing Order No. 63).