(11 years, 6 months ago)
Ministerial CorrectionsRead Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Tom Greatrex
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions with reference to the answer of 1 May 2012, to the hon. Member for Cardiff West, Official Report, column 1407W, on Atos, what the monetary value was of each contract between his Department and Atos in (a) 2008-09, (b) 2009-10 and (c) 2010-11.
[Official Report, 22 May 2012, Vol. 545, c. 643W.]
Letter of correction from Chris Grayling
An error has been identified in the written answer given to the hon. Member for Rutherglen and Hamilton West (Tom Greatrex) on 22 May 2012.
The full answer given was as follows:
Chris Grayling
The spend values for the five DWP contracts with Atos are as follows:
Policy area | Spend in 2008-09 | Spend in 2009-10 | Spend in 2010-11 |
|---|---|---|---|
Medical Services | 111,800 | 99,100,000 | 112,800,000 |
Tell Us Once—Tell Us Once Release A | 2,568,409 | 2,214,608 | 2,471,873 |
enGage (Government Gateway) | 22,933,466 | 20,560,958 | 15,745,685 |
Occupational Health | 0 | 0 | 9,840,000 |
Community Action Programme | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Notes: 1. There are £0 spend values against the Community Action Programme contract because (a) it did not exist in until November 2011 and (b) the outcome based payment model used will only see costs becoming due in early 2012-13. 2. There are £0 spend values against the Occupational Health contract because it did not exist in the 2008-09 and 2009-10 financial years. |
The correct answer should have been:
Chris Grayling
The spend values for the five DWP contracts with Atos are as follows:
Policy area | Spend in 2008-09 | Spend in 2009-10 | Spend in 2010-11 |
|---|---|---|---|
Medical Services | 111,800 | 99,100,000 | 112,800,000 |
Occupational Health | 2,568,409 | 2,214,608 | 2,471,873 |
enGage (Government Gateway) | 22,933,466 | 20,560,958 | 15,745,685 |
Tell Us Once—Tell Us Once Release A | 0 | 0 | 9,840,000 |
Community Action Programme | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Notes: 1. There are £0 spend values against the Community Action Programme contract because (a) it did not exist in until November 2011 and (b) the outcome based payment model used will only see costs becoming due in early 2012-13. 2. There are £0 spend values against the Tell Us Once—Tell Us Once Release A contract because it did not exist in the 2008-09 and 2009-10 financial years. |