Petitions

Wednesday 12th February 2014

(10 years, 3 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Wednesday 12 February 2014

Proposed Bund Construction on Oregon Close, Kingswinford, Dudley

Wednesday 12th February 2014

(10 years, 3 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The Petition of residents of Dudley South,
Declares that a planning application on Oregon Close (P13/1596) has been presented to Dudley Metropolitan Council; further that the Petitioners believe that the construction of bunds to a height of six metres on top of an existing four metre wall has the potential to structurally damage the surrounding houses; further that the Petitioners believe that bringing forward the construction to 2014 provides insufficient time to arrange a professional structural survey of the retaining wall and affected huses and to put movement monitoring equipment in place; further that the Petitioners object to the noise and toxic fumes which will be endured for twelve months; and further that the Petitioners believe that their quality of life and health will be detrimentally affected if the proposal in this planning application is accepted.
The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to encourage Dudley Metropolitan Council to reject the planning application on Oregon Close.
And the Petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Chris Kelly, Official Report, 3 December 2013; Vol. 571, c. 887.]
[P001304]
Observations from the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government:
The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government has been informed that a planning application has been submitted to Dudley Metropolitan Council in respect of the construction of bunds to an existing wall on Oregon Close.
Dudley Metropolitan Council are responsible for the day to day planning control in their area, and the Secretary of State cannot comment on the merits or otherwise of any application. The Government’s policy is not to interfere with the jurisdiction of a local planning authority unless it is necessary to do so. This is because local authority councillors are elected to represent the views of local people and, in the main, it is these councillors who are in the best position to decide whether a development should go ahead. It is, of course, for local planning authorities to provide whatever justification it may be appropriate to give for their decisions and procedures.
In determining a planning application, the local planning authority, who have full knowledge of the local circumstances, are required to have regard to all material considerations including the development plan, national policies and views expressed by third parties.
The Secretary of State might decide to call in the application for his own determination if he considers that it raises matters of more than local importance, but his policy is to be very selective about this. As it is possible that this proposal may, at some future date, come within his jurisdiction, it would be inappropriate to comment on the issues raised in the petition.

Ennerdale Swimming Pool (Kingston upon Hull)

Wednesday 12th February 2014

(10 years, 3 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The Petition of residents of Kingston upon Hull,
Declares that the Petitioners note that Ennerdale Leisure Centre’s swimming pool is the only swimming facility serving the entire Hull area that is recognised by the Amateur Swimming Association as being of competition standard; further notes that Hull City Council is considering proposals to close Ennerdale’s swimming pool, due to the unfair level of local authority funding cuts that Hull is receiving from the Coalition Government, when compared to far less severe cuts being made to councils in wealthier areas of the country.
The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to request Hull councillors to work with service users to find ways of saving Ennerdale swimming pool and provide Hull with a fairer deal on funding that will enable Ennerdale swimming pool to remain open, alongside other valued sports and leisure facilities in Hull.
And the Petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Diana Johnson, Official Report, 4 December 2013; Vol. 571, c. 1050.]
[P001306]
Observations from the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport:
The Government acknowledge the contribution of Ennerdale Leisure Centre to the provision of swimming facilities in Hull.
This Government welcome the news that Hull Clinical Commissioning Group (HCCG) has agreed to fund the swimming pools at Ennerdale Leisure Centre for another year. The decision was reached on the basis the HCCG is involved in further discussions about the future of the facility. Sport England will also be part of the ongoing discussions about swimming facilities in Hull.
Local authorities consider the age, condition and location of sporting and leisure facilities when reviewing their facilities provision. Sport England is aware of the challenges facing local authorities in the current economic climate and is supporting over 80 local authorities to develop a strategic approach to facility provision. This includes Hull City Council, where they provide ongoing advice and support.
Sport England continues to invest in swimming pool provision in England and is investing £5 million to upgrade pool changing provision at 19 pools around England through the Improvement Fund. It is also managing the relocation of nine Olympic legacy swimming pools around the country. The total number of swimming pools in England has increased by 134 since 2011, and currently stands at 5,116.