All 3 Petitions debates in the Commons on 18th Jan 2021

Petitions

Monday 18th January 2021

(3 years, 3 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Monday 18 January 2021

Accessibility of leisure attractions

Monday 18th January 2021

(3 years, 3 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of the residents of Stroud and the surrounding area,
Declares that all leisure attractions including theme parks should be adjusted to ensure that they are accessible to all citizens; further that all attractions built in the future should be fully accessible where possible to ensure that all disabled visitors are provided with equal dignity, an equal opportunity to experience the leisure attractions and equal value of money for their trips as all other guests; and further that guests should not be required to take disability tests.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to take into account the concerns of the petitions and take immediate action to ensure that all leisure attractions are accessible to all individuals irrespective of ability.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Siobhan Baillie, Official Report, 18 November 2020; Vol. 684, c. 434.]
[P002627]
Observations from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (Nigel Huddleston):
The Equality Act 2010 requires service providers, including tourist attractions such as theme parks, to make reasonable adjustments to improve access to disabled customers of all ages. Disabled customers should not be placed at a substantial disadvantage to non-disabled customers. This is an anticipatory duty, meaning that service providers should plan on the assumption that a proportion of their customers will be disabled and make adjustments for this, rather than waiting, for example, for specific requests for wheelchair access.
The Equality Advisory and Support Service can be contacted via its website, telephone or textphone by anyone who believes that they, or their children, have been discriminated against in the provision of services. This Service can contact a service provider on the customer’s behalf to discuss any particular concerns raised. It also liaises with the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which has powers to enforce the provisions of the Equality Act—although in most cases taking legal action will be a matter for individuals who believe that they have experienced discrimination.
More broadly, the Government are taking a number of steps to improve accessibility within the tourism sector. VisitEngland, the national tourist board, has developed a dedicated web portal providing tailored business advice to tourism businesses, including guidance on how to welcome guests with different access needs. VisitEngland has also made sure that its promotional and marketing activities are inclusive. For example, its Escape the Everyday campaign worked in partnership with Channel 4 to launch the Mission: Accessible series, which showcases accessible places to visit across the UK.
At the Budget last year, the Chancellor announced a £30 million Changing Places Fund to increase the provision of Changing Places toilets in public buildings, including leisure buildings and theme parks.
The Government have also committed to publishing a National Strategy for Disabled People.
The Tourism Sector Deal, published in June 2019, set out an ambition to make the UK the most accessible destination in Europe by 2025. We will continue to engage with stakeholders to assess how we can support inclusive tourism as the sector recovers from covid-19.

Banning of unpaid work trials

Monday 18th January 2021

(3 years, 3 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of Glasgow North,
Declares that unpaid trial shifts are open to exploitation and can be used by unscrupulous employers to take advantage of vulnerable people looking for a job; further that often unpaid trials are for minimum wage jobs and the people applying for them cannot afford to work for free but may have no other option; further that unpaid trial shift workers may also have to incur the cost of travelling to and from the trial shift as well as procuring a uniform; further that potential employees may feel as though they cannot say no to exploitative trials without risking their future livelihood; and further that it is unfair to force someone to work for hours without pay, and incur additional costs, for a job they might not even get.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to take action and ban all unpaid work trials.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Patrick Grady, Official Report, 18 November 2020; Vol. 684, c. 434.]
[P002629]
Observations from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (Paul Scully):
UK employment law sets out the statutory minimum rights and responsibilities for individuals and employers in the workplace. The Government have always been absolutely clear that employers must take their employment responsibilities seriously and cannot simply opt out of them.
National minimum wage legislation provides that an individual who is ‘working’ for minimum wage purposes must be paid at least the national minimum wage or national living wage. Most workers in the UK who are over compulsory school age and who ordinarily work in the UK are entitled to be paid at least the minimum wage.
As part of a recruitment process, an individual may be asked by a prospective employer to carry out tasks, without payment, to help the employer to decide whether the individual has the skills and qualities required for the job.
An individual will generally be a ‘worker’ if they have a contract of employment or a contract to provide work or services. There may be a contract even though there is nothing in writing. Where an employer asks an individual to carry out a ‘trial’, ‘test’ or ‘recruitment exercise’, the individual may nevertheless be a ‘worker’ and entitled to minimum wage, depending on the circumstances of the case.
There are no definitive rules or tests. Work trials have to be assessed on a case-by-case basis by HMRC enforcement officers and, where necessary, by courts and tribunals. They will take account of the precise detail of the arrangements, including the duration and what the worker is being asked to do, and are likely to take account of the following factors:
Whether a ‘work trial’ is genuinely for recruitment purposes;
Whether the trial length exceeds the time that the employer would reasonably need to test the individual’s ability to carry out the job offered;
The extent to which the individual is observed while carrying out the tasks;
The nature of the tasks carried out by the individual and how closely these relate to the job offered;
Whether the tasks carried out have a value to the employer beyond testing the individual; and
Whether trial periods are important (aside from recruiting) to the way the employer runs its business.
The Government are aware of reports of some unpaid trial work periods extending across more than one full shift or several days. Unpaid trials of this sort of length in a real (not simulated) work environment are likely to create an entitlement to minimum wage in all but very exceptional circumstances. This is because what is done by the individual would almost certainly have substantial value to the employer rather than testing the individual’s ability.
However, an unpaid trial work period lasting a few hours may be reasonable and not create an entitlement to minimum wage. This is because the main purpose would likely be to test the individual, and what is done would probably have little or no other value to the employer: the substance of the |arrangement would concern recruitment rather than providing work. Unpaid work trial opportunities as| part of a genuine recruitment process could help workers to gain substantive employment.
The Government have published guidance, with illustrative examples, to clarify the rights and obligations of workers and employers, respectively. Any worker who has concerns about unpaid work trials is strongly encouraged to call ACAS (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service) on 0300123 1100 for free, impartial and confidential advice. ACAS officers will pass on cases to HMRC for further consideration where appropriate. HMRC officers consider every complaint they receive and will take enforcement action where they consider workers are being exploited under the cover of recruitment. As such, the Government do not currently have any plans to ban unpaid work trials.