Petitions

Thursday 22nd June 2023

(11 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Thursday 22 June 2023

Local post office closure

Thursday 22nd June 2023

(11 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of Coventry South
Declares that local Post Offices provide a vital service for the community, further declares that it is particularly important that they are nearby and easily accessible for older people and people with mobility difficulties, notes that the closure of Daventry Road Post Office in Cheylesmore, Coventry, resulted in the loss of this service in the area.
The petitioners therefore urge the House of Commons to support better provision of Post Offices in the community, and specifically for the Post Office on Daventry Road to serve the community of Quinton Park, Cheylesmore, Coventry.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Zarah Sultana, Official Report, 18 April 2023; Vol. 731, c. 216.]
[P002828]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business and Trade (Kevin Hollinrake):
While publicly owned, Post Office operates at arm’s length from Government as a commercial business with its own board. The management of the branch network is an operational responsibility for Post Office Limited. It would therefore not be appropriate for Government to intervene directly in this situation.
However, the Government recognise how important post offices are to their communities, and thus fully appreciate the impact a Post Office branch closure can have on a community. The Government-set access criteria ensure that however the network changes, services remain within local reach of all citizens. The access criteria ensure that 90% of the population are within 1 mile of their nearest post office branch and that 99% of the population are within 3 miles of their nearest post office branch.
The nearest branch from the recently closed Daventry Road post office is the Styvechale post office, at 82 Baginton Road, Coventry CV3 6FQ, which is located just over a mile away from Daventry Road. The Government understand that Post Office Limited has received an application for a new post office located in Daventry Road. This application is currently being progressed.

East Putney station

Thursday 22nd June 2023

(11 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of Putney,
Declares that the latest available figures show a footfall of 6.18 million passengers a year through East Putney station, more than neighbouring Southfields and Putney Bridge stations yet there is currently no step-free access to the station platform, notes that this makes it impossible for many people with mobility issues to use the station and very difficult and dangerous for parents with wheelchairs, anyone with luggage and during peak usage times, and further declares that step-free access at East Putney Station is urgently needed to increase accessibility for all those wishing to use it.
The petitioners therefore request the House of Commons to urge the Government to consider East Putney tube station for step free funding and deliver step free access at East Putney station.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Fleur Anderson, Official Report, 8 June 2023; Vol. 733, c. 953.]
[P002835]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Mr Richard Holden):
Transport in London is devolved to the Mayor and TfL, and this includes decisions with regards to accessibility on the TfL network. It is up to them to determine where best to deliver step-free access and identify the funding for it.
The longer-term funding settlement agreed between Government and TfL of 30 August 2022 supports almost £3.6 billion-worth of projects, secures the long-term future of London’s transport network, and brings Government’s total funding to over £6 billion since the start of the pandemic.

Incorrect child maintenance assessments

Thursday 22nd June 2023

(11 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of Craig Bulman,
Declares that many Non-Resident Parents (NRP's) Paying Parents (PP's) have been incorrectly assessed by the Child Support Agency (CSA)/Child Maintenance Service (CMS); further that these incorrect assessments followed by wrongful enforcement has caused the NRP's/PP's loss harm and injury, financial loss and an impact on their mental health, further declares that there is no proper way to compensate the victims who have been affected.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to urgently compensate those affected by incorrect child maintenance assessments.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Official Report, 27 April 2023; Vol. 731, c. 18P.]
[P002831]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Mims Davies):
The Child Maintenance Service (CMS) calculation process is simple and efficient; it uses income information for the latest available complete tax year, provided by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) which ensures transparency in the process and consistent use of data across Government. Access to income information reported by HMRC also allows the CMS to capture a wide range of income types, including income from property, savings and investments (including dividends), and other miscellaneous income. Calculations are reviewed annually so they stay up to date, and parents can report a change in their income at any time. If the change is significant enough, the CMS can amend the maintenance calculation.
The calculation is designed to be fair for both parents whilst ensuring the paying parent contributes a reasonable amount of their income to support their children they don’t live with. It takes into account the number of qualifying children, any other children that the paying parent is responsible for, and the number of nights the paying parent has overnight care of the qualifying children. The calculation represents an amount of money that is broadly commensurate with the amount a paying parent would spend on the child if they were still living with them.
Child maintenance calculation rates are set out in legislation. If a parent disagrees with a calculation decision made by the CMS, they can ask for a mandatory reconsideration. If a parent is unhappy with the outcome of the mandatory reconsideration, they can appeal to the independent Social Security and Child Support Tribunal within one month of the mandatory reconsideration decision.
Where the paying parent fails to pay on time or in full, the CMS will attempt to regain compliance. Paying parents are given warnings of the consequences of non-compliance and caseworkers will seek to establish reasons for missed payments, help parents get back on track with their payments and put a repayment plan in place. If a paying parent is experiencing financial difficulties, CMS caseworkers can signpost parents to financial support and debt advice.
Enforcement powers are used as a last resort and are designed to get money flowing quickly, prevent the build-up of arrears and ensure children get the financial support they deserve. These powers are important to deal with the minority of parents who do not pay, and to deter others from trying the same. Decisions about enforcement actions are made on a case-by-case basis, considering the welfare of all parties, and what will have the greatest chance of securing money for children.
The CMS must consider the welfare of any children involved in any decision regarding enforcement action. Safeguards are in place throughout the process to ensure enforcement action is reasonable and proportionate, and that paying parents are given adequate opportunities to challenge any decision.