Petitions

Monday 15th April 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Monday 15 April 2024

Food Insecurity

Monday 15th April 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of Linlithgow and East Falkirk,
Declares that in a time of crisis in the cost of living, one in four UK households with children have experienced food insecurity, affecting an estimated four million children; further that in their struggle to feed their children, 28% of young mums are skipping meals each day, with this figure increasing to 37% among young mums on Universal Credit; and notes that while the spiralling cost of energy is affecting he cost of food production, storage and transport and families find themselves choosing between heating and eating, oil and gas companies post record profits, paying out billions to shareholders and continuing to be aided by UK Government subsidies and tax reliefs.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to review the rate of Universal Credit to ensure it covers the essentials and that no parent or child goes hungry, and also that the Government introduces measures to stop oil and gas companies profiting at record levels whilst families are unable to afford necessities.
And the petitioners remain etc.—[Presented by Martyn Day, Official Report, 30 January 2024; Vol. 744, c. 832.]
[P002906]
Observations from the Minister for Employment (Jo Churchill):
Universal credit awards include a standard allowance, which is the core component of any award and is paid according to age and household unit. The purpose of the standard allowance is to provide for basic living costs. Additional amounts are added to provide for individual needs such as housing, children, disability, and childcare costs.
There is no objective way of deciding what an appropriate level of benefit should be, as each customer has different requirements depending on their circumstances.
Income-related benefit rates are not made up of separate amounts for specific items of expenditure, such as food. Each customer’s requirements vary and to attempt to base rates upon personal expenditure would produce an unfair and unsustainable system.
The Government do not consider it appropriate to introduce changes that would prioritise one particular area of household expenditure over the cost of other essential goods and services. Individuals should be free to spend their benefit as they see fit, in the light of their individual commitments, needs and preferences.
The Government have spent around £276 billion through the welfare system in 2023-24, including around £124 billion on people of working age and children, and from April 2024 most benefit rates will increase by 6.7% in line with prices growth.
Since 2022, the Government have demonstrated their commitment to supporting the most vulnerable by providing one of the largest support packages in Europe, with help for households with the cost of living totalling £96 billion from 2022-23 to 2023- 2024.
Since October 2022, the consumer prices index has already more than halved from 11.1% to 3.4%. This is stabilising the financial situation for many families, and the Office for Budget Responsibility expects that by quarter 4 of 2024 CPI will have fallen to 1.4%.
However, we recognise that some people will need further, targeted help to get back to a stable financial position.
The Government are providing an additional £500 million to enable the extension of the household support fund, including funding for the devolved Administrations through the Barnett formula. This means that local authorities in England will receive an additional £421 million to support those in need locally through the household support fund.
The funding will be available to local authorities in England from 1 April 2024 and will run until 30 September 2024.
In response to huge energy bill spikes caused by Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, the Government provided unprecedented levels of assistance to households last winter with the typical household receiving £1,500 of support from October 2022 to June 2023.
Energy prices have significantly fallen in the past year alone and the Q2 2024 price cap of £1,690 was announced by Ofgem in February 2024. This is the lowest that energy prices have been for two years.
The Government continue to provide support through the warm home discount, which provides low-income households with an annual £150 rebate off their energy bill every winter.
Since May 2022, companies engaged in the production of oil and gas in the UK and on the UK Continental Shelf have been subject to energy profits levy, which was introduced to respond to exceptionally high prices that meant that oil and gas companies were benefiting from unexpectedly high profits. Currently, inclusive of the EPL, oil and gas companies are subject to a 75% headline tax rate on their profits.
At spring Budget 2024, the Government confirmed that they would extend the sunset of the EPL by one year until March 2029. This means companies exploring for or producing oil and gas in the UK will continue paying a 35% additional tax on their profits while prices are projected to remain high. The additional £1.5 billion raised from the sector will help the Government to cut taxes for hard-working families, reward hard work and support growth in the economy.
From 2023-24 to 2028-29, the Office for Budget Responsibility expects the EPL to raise over £12 billion. Revenues from the levy are on top of over £8 billion in tax receipts expected from the sector over the same period through the permanent tax regime, ensuring the oil and gas sector pays its fair share. The more than £6 billion revenue raised by the EPL since its introduction has helped fund vital cost of living support, including the energy price guarantee on household energy bills and additional support for those most in need. While the UK still needs oil and gas, it makes sense to encourage investment in domestic resources and retain the economic benefits and support UK jobs. That is why the more a company invests, the less tax it will pay. This helps to encourage the oil and gas sector to reinvest its profits in the UK.
Reducing inflation and growing the economy are the most effective ways to build a more prosperous future for all. This Government committed to halving the rate of inflation, and have achieved that.

Household Support Fund beyond April 2024

Monday 15th April 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of Manchester Gorton,
Declares that the Household Support Fund has played a vital role in supporting low income households to pay for essentials like energy bills and food following the pandemic and during the cost of living crisis; notes that since October 2021, the Government has provided over £2 billion to local authorities in England; further declares that over 10 million awards were made using this funding between 1 October 2022 and 31 March 2023, playing an important role it played in alleviating poverty; and further declares that the government has failed to commit to funding the Household Support Fund beyond March 2024 which risks plunging millions of people across England into poverty.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to provide adequate support for low-income households for essentials through the Household Support Fund, and ensuring this provision is extended beyond March 2024.
And the petitioners remain, etc. —[Presented by Afzal Khan, Official Report, 30 January 2024; Vol. 744, c. 831.]
[P002900]
Observations from the Minister for Employment (Jo Churchill):
The household support fund is a scheme run by upper-tier local authorities in England to provide discretionary support towards the cost of essentials to those most in need.
Since October 2022, the consumer prices index has already more than halved from 11.1% to 4.0%. This is stabilising the financial situation for many families, and the Office for Budget Responsibility expects that by quarter 4 of 2024 (October to December) CPI will have fallen to 1.4%.
In the meantime, some people will need further targeted help to get back to a stable financial position.
That is why the Government are providing an additional £500 million to enable the extension of the household support fund, including funding for the devolved Administrations through the Barnett formula to be spent at their discretion. This means that local authorities in England will receive an additional £421 million to support those in need locally through the household support fund.
The funding will be available to local authorities in England from 1 April 2024 and will run until 30 September 2024.
The guidance and individual local authority allocations for this forthcoming extension will be announced as soon as possible ahead of the scheme beginning on 1 April 2024.

Protection of Breakwater Beach in Brixham

Monday 15th April 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of Brixham in the constituency of Totnes,
Declares that residents are concerned about the proposed development at Breakwater Beach in Brixham; notes that while no formal plans have been submitted to Torbay Council, the drawings that were recently unveiled have not been welcomed by residents due to the adverse impact the development would have locally; further declares that Breakwater Beach should be protected due to the beauty and nature of the surrounding coastal area.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to work with Torbay Council to ensure that Breakwater Beach Brixham be declared a Town and Village Green.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Anthony Mangnall, Official Report, 6 February 2024; Vol. 745, c. 220.]
[P002910]
Observations from the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Steve Barclay):
The Government appreciate the concerns raised by the petitioners regarding the protection of Breakwater Beach in Brixham.
The designation of town and village greens falls outside the purview of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs as it is a devolved issue, and responsibility for this process lies with the relevant local registration authority (usually the county council). Provided the right to apply has not been excluded, anyone can apply under section 15(1) of the Commons Act 2006 to register land as a green if it has been used by local people for lawful sports and pastimes “as of right” for at least 20 years. Further guidance and information can be found at the link below and/or via your local registration authority.
Town and village greens: how to register (www.gov.uk)
Petitioners may wish to consider applying for Breakwater Beach’s designation as a town or village green under the Commons Act 2006. If successful, this process would ensure legal protection, preserving the beach for community use and preventing any development that would conflict with such use.

Immigration health surcharge

Monday 15th April 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of Linlithgow and East Falkirk,
Declares that in this time of crisis in the cost of living, the spiralling cost of the immigration health surcharge paid by migrants is alarming; further that the immigration health surcharge now stands at £1035 per annum, representing a 400% increase compared with five years ago; further that when combined with the increases in visa and immigration fees, many migrant families are facing poverty, debt and destitution as they try to bear these costs; and notes that migrant workers are a vital part of our communities and our workforce, including in the UK’s health and social care sectors.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to review the immigration health surcharge, taking account of the fact that migrants already pay into and contribute significantly to health and care services across the UK.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Martyn Day, Official Report, 13 March 2024; Vol. 747, c. 396 .]
[P002925]
Observations from the Minister for Legal Migration and the Border (Tom Pursglove):
While the significant contribution migrants make to the UK is recognised, it is the Government’s policy that they should contribute directly to the comprehensive nd high-quality NHS services available to them from the moment they arrive in the UK.
The immigration health surcharge is paid by temporary migrants applying for a visa to enter the UK for more than six months. It is paid up front, is separate to the visa fee, and covers the full cost to the NHS of providing healthcare to those who pay it.
Once paid, an IHS payer can access NHS services in broadly the same manner as permanent residents— without having made any prior tax or national insurance contributions. Where additional NHS charges are paid, these are consistent with those paid by a UK resident, such as prescription charges in England.
Some temporary migrants will be paying tax and national insurance contributions. However, they will not have made the same financial contribution to the NHS which most UK nationals and permanent residents have made, or will make, over the course of their working lives. It is the migrant’s immigration status that determines whether or not they pay the IHS, not their tax contributions.
It is therefore right and fair that an up-front financial contribution to the NHS is required.
The IHS was increased in February this year, as agreed by Parliament, to £1,035 per person per annum, with the discounted rate for students, their dependents, those on youth mobility schemes, and under-18s increasing to £776 per person per annum. These new levels reflect the increases in healthcare expenditure and utilise the latest revised assumptions of migrant use of healthcare services. I note the increase does not represent the claimed 400% increase in five years.
It is important to highlight that safeguards exist in administrating the IHS. The Government recognise the cost of the IHS may be unaffordable for some. On family and human rights routes a fee waiver application can be made, and a full fee waiver will be granted if it is determined the applicant cannot afford the visa fee, and the IHS. A partial fee waiver can be granted if it is determined they can afford the visa fee but not the IHS as well.
Finally, the IHS is designed to benefit our NHS and support its long-term sustainability. Payment of the IHS provides near comprehensive access to our health service, regardless of the amount of care needed. It is right that migrants granted temporary permission to be in the UK make a financial contribution to the running of NHS services available to them during their stay.

Sale of arms to Israel

Monday 15th April 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of Linlithgow and East Falkirk,
Declares that the government’s sale of arms to Israel is unacceptable, as there is substantial evidence that these arms are being used to kill innocent civilians in Gaza; further declares that this is in direct breach of the UK arms export policy, which states that the licences cannot be granted if there is a “clear risk” the arms might be used in a serious violation of international humanitarian law.
The petitioners therefore request the House of Commons to urge the Government to suspend all arms transfers to Israel including weapons, arms, munition and ammunition, parts and components and other equipment that pose a substantial risk that they could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in this conflict.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Martyn Day, Official Report, 31 January 2024; Vol. 744, c. 954.]
[P002909]
Observations from the Minister for Trade Policy (Greg Hands):
The Government take their export control responsibilities very seriously and operate one of the most robust and transparent export control regimes in the world. The Government assess every application on a case-by-case basis.
Since October 2022, CPI has already more than halved, from 11.1% to 4.0%. This is stabilising the financial situation for many families, and the Office for Budget Responsibility expects that by the fourth quarter of 2024—October-December—CPI will have fallen to 1.4%.
In the meantime, some people will need further, targeted help to get back to a stable financial position.
That is why the Government are providing an additional £500 million to enable the extension of the household support fund, including funding for the devolved Administrations through the Barnett formula, to be spent at their discretion. This means that local authorities in England will receive an additional £421 million to support those in need locally through the household support fund.
The funding will be available to local authorities in England from 1 April 2024 and will run until 30 September 2024.
The guidance and individual local authority allocations for this forthcoming extension will be announced as soon as possible ahead of the scheme beginning on 1 April 2024.

Traffic congestion and road safety in Rother Valley

Monday 15th April 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of Rother Valley,
Declares that measures are needed to combat traffic congestion and speeding in the villages of Aughton and Guilthwaite; further that the Treeton Lane/Main Street/ Pleasley Road and Ulley Lane crossroads require a road safety and traffic management scheme; and further that road safety measures are needed at the Robin Hood pub junction in Aston as expanding housing estates nearby are putting increased pressure on this junction, making safe emergence difficult and time consuming.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to call on Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council to work alongside the Sheffield Mayoral Combined Authority and that they consider the use of funding from the City Region Sustainable Transport Settlements scheme to devise a package of improvements to Pleasley Road and Ulley Crossroads that promotes road safety and active travel, and supports public transport expansion to ease congestion.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Alexander Stafford, Official Report, 19 March 2024; Vol. 747, c. 903.]
[P002924]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Guy Opperman):
As Roads Minister, I am committed to improving road safety throughout the country. Through the safer roads fund, this Government have invested £100 million since April 2017 in improving the top 50 most high-risk roads in England. In April 2023 we added a further £47.5 million to the fund, bringing the total number of roads being improved to 83.
This includes a 50% funding uplift to invest £5.1 million for tackling the priority roads across Yorkshire and Humber, including A6022 between Swinton and Mexborough and A625 between Sheffield and Whirlow.
Local authorities (LAs) are responsible for managing their roads. The Traffic Management Act 2004 places the network management duty on them to manage roads as efficiently as possible for the benefit of all traffic, including pedestrians and cyclists. LAs have a wide range of traffic management measures and tools available to them to fulfil this duty, and it is for them to decide how to use these to address local issues.
To enable this, as part of the traffic signals upgrade and maintenance grants included in “Plan for Drivers”, Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council has received £500,000 grant funding from the traffic signal obsolescence grant to update and renew traffic signal equipment. They will also share in an award of £326,615 made to the South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority (SYMCA).
As set out in the devolution deal between central Government and SMYCA, central funding for local transport was consolidated and devolved to SYMCA. This means that responsibility for highways maintenance and development, and delivery of other local infrastructure, is directed by local prioritisation decisions. As part of the city region sustainable transport settlements (CRSTS), these priorities were submitted to the Department by the Mayor in early 2022 and were agreed in the delivery plans published on www.gov.uk.
I have listened and will continue to listen to the views of all road users to ensure that we build on the Department’s ongoing work as outlined above to improve road safety.

Rent and Service Charge increases in Lewisham East

Monday 15th April 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of Lewisham East,
Declares that Moat Housing has written to inform the residents in Phoebe’s Place, SE62FA, which was developed in 2021 of 27 Flats as part of the affordable housing scheme, regarding increases in rent ranging from 8.6% to 9.4%, and increases in service charge, ranging from 30.3% to 65%; notes that this exceeds current levels of inflation; and further that the petitioners believe that the proposed rent and service charge increases are not justified nor affordable.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to call on Moat Housing to review their decision and that any increase in this year and in future years remain at the very least in line with inflation.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Janet Daby, Official Report, 26 March 2024; Vol. 747, c. 1466.]
[P002948]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (Baroness Scott of Bybrook):
I am sorry to hear of the petitioners’ concerns over the recent increases to their rent and service charges. We have been clear in our discussions with registered providers of social housing that we expect them to take reasonable and responsible decisions at a time when many shared owners are experiencing pressures on their finances.
Annual increases to shared ownership rents are set according to the terms of the lease agreement between a shared owner and their registered provider. As these are legally binding agreements, any decision to implement an increase below the amount permitted in the lease is a decision for individual registered providers to take independently.
The Government welcome the fact that most registered providers chose to limit their annual shared ownership rent increases to no more than 7% in 2023-24, in response to particularly high levels of inflation. This mirrored the regulatory limit of 7% that was imposed for other forms of rented social housing in 2023-24.
Increases in service charges without proper justification are completely unacceptable, which is why were are committed to strengthening protections for leaseholders, including shared owners, through the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill.
If a shared owner is concerned about a service charge they are being asked to pay, they can seek free and independent initial advice from the Government-funded Leasehold Advisory Service.
There are also routes for redress open to shared owners where they consider that a service charge has been wrongly incurred or is excessively high. For example, variable service charges are subject to specific legal requirements. These are that service charges must be reasonable and that, where costs relate to work or services, the work or services must be completed to a reasonable standard. Where necessary, shared owners may make an application to the First-tier Tribunal —Property Chamber—for a determination on the reasonableness of their variable service charges.
We know that leaseholders may be liable currently to cover their landlord’s legal costs as part of any application to the First-tier Tribunal, and that this may act as a deterrent to some applications. The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill will address this imbalance by scrapping the presumption that leaseholders, including shared owners, pay their landlord’s legal costs when taking disputes to the First-tier Tribunal.
The Bill also includes proposals to ensure that leaseholders receive minimum key financial and non-financial information on a regular basis. This will help leaseholders, including shared owners, to more easily challenge poor practice, including in relation to service charges.
If shared owners are unhappy with any communications surrounding how their service charges are calculated, they should approach their registered provider directly through their official complaints process. If this fails to resolve the matter satisfactorily, they may be able to ask the Housing Ombudsman to investigate their complaint. The Ombudsman does not investigate complaints about the level of service charges, but it may investigate complaints about their calculation, collection, or communication.
Further information on how to make an official complaint to a registered provider and then, where necessary, to the ombudsman can be found via the website for our “Make Things Right” campaign.