Petitions

Monday 27th April 2026

(1 day, 9 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Monday 27 April 2026

College Fields in Madeley

Monday 27th April 2026

(1 day, 9 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of Newcastle-under-Lyme,
Declares that there is growing concern in Madeley about proposals that would limit public access to College Fields, a green space that has been used by the community for many years; further declares that the prospect of fencing and restricted access has caused significant local opposition and raised questions about how decisions affecting the site are being made; further declares that College Fields is an important part of community life in Madeley, providing space for informal recreation, wellbeing and outdoor activity and therefore losing or limiting access to this field would have a real impact on local residents; further declares that local people have been clear that they want College Fields to remain open and accessible, and that any decisions about its future must be taken transparently and with meaningful community engagement; and further declares that imposing changes without proper consultation risks undermining trust and damaging a valued local asset.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to encourage Staffordshire County Council to commit to protecting College Fields, to rule out the erection of fencing or other measures that would restrict public access, and to work constructively with Madeley residents and local stakeholders to agree a future for the site that reflects the needs and priorities of the community.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Adam Jogee, Official Report, 24 February 2026; Vol. 781, c. 305.]
[P003164]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Education (Josh MacAlister):
The Department for Education recognises the concerns raised by Madeley residents regarding access to College Fields and understands the value of local green spaces. It is not unusual for concerns to arise where members of the public have historically accessed land that is part of an operational school site.
The land in question forms part of the Shaw Education Trust’s leased school site, following Madeley high school’s conversion to academy status in 2013, and was also educational land and part of the school’s site, prior to this date.
Decisions about land management, including fencing or boundary changes, sit in the first instance with the academy trust as leaseholder and with the relevant freeholder. Education assets must be secured in the first instance to protect their educational use. The Department for Education therefore supports schools in securing the perimeter of education land where necessary for safeguarding and effective operation, as outlined in our guidance on good estate management for schools which can be found at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/good-estate-management-for-schools/maintaining-your-estate and https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-and-college-security/site-security-guidance.
Open access can hinder a school’s use of its grounds for teaching, sport or outdoor learning, due to issues such as littering, dog fouling and unauthorised use.
The Department for Education encourages schools and local authorities to engage with residents when concerns arise. The school and residents may come to an agreement that allows the residents access, but access arrangements must remain consistent with safeguarding requirements and the proper operation of the school to protect education use. Agreements may include limited access times and, optionally, maintenance and repair conditions.
Additionally, if an academy trust determines that part of its site is genuinely surplus to educational requirements, it may propose to surrender that land back to the local authority, subject to Secretary of State consent. If consent is granted, the local authority may then consider making the land available as public open space, subject to further Secretary of State consent. There is no requirement on an academy to release land, and any consent would only be granted where the academy can demonstrate the land is genuinely surplus. It is therefore for the school and local authority to consider their needs.
The assets of community value regulations allow communities to nominate land for listing by the relevant local authority as an asset of community value. However, an exemption to these regulations ensures that this process does not prevent disposals for state-funded school sites. This reflects the principle that education assets should be protected for education use.

Road safety in Old Woking

Monday 27th April 2026

(1 day, 9 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of Woking,
Declares that there are serious concerns about the speed and volume of traffic on Old Woking High Street, particularly near St Peter's Church, with cars colliding into horses, and causing extensive damage; further declares that a woman who recently gave birth required medical attention due to the trauma of one such incident, and the family has now been moved into temporary accommodation - this incident has deeply affected the community; notes that there have been four other incidents in the past couple of years, all linked to speeding or loss of control on this same stretch of road; further notes that the combination of heavy traffic and excessive speed poses a persistent danger, yet there are currently no effective measures in place to slow vehicles or manage the flow of traffic.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to take immediate action to provide effective measures in place to slow vehicles or manage the flow of traffic in Old Woking.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Mr Will Forster, Official Report, 14 April 2026; Vol. 783, c. 799.]
[P003184]
Observations from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Lilian Greenwood): The Government are conscious of the disruption and distress caused to residents by recent incidents on Old Woking high street and recognise the importance of addressing community concerns about traffic speed and volume. My thoughts are with those affected and with the community more broadly.
Any incident of this nature is deeply troubling. While responsibility for investigating individual collisions rests locally, a pattern of incidents on the same stretch of road reinforces the need for careful assessment of traffic conditions, road design and speed management arrangements. That assessment sits with the local traffic authority, and in this case Surrey county council is best placed to consider conditions on Old Woking high street, drawing on its detailed knowledge of the area, traffic flows, collision history and community concerns.
Local traffic authorities have a wide range of tools available to them where people and traffic mix. These include reduced speed limits, traffic-calming features, changes to road layout, improved signage, pedestrian crossings, parking controls and roadside enforcement measures. Authorities are asked to have regard to the Department for Transport’s “Setting local speed limits” guidance when making these decisions, but the final determination rests locally, working with the police who are responsible for enforcement.
While historical collision data can and should inform assessments, the Government are clear that proactive safety measures should not be contingent on a fatal or serious injury occurring. Evidence of near misses, repeat loss-of-control incidents, community anxiety and local risk factors are all valid considerations when authorities decide how best to intervene.
As set out in the Government’s recently published road safety strategy, improving safety on roads such as Old Woking high street requires a system-wide approach. This includes managing vehicle speeds, improving compliance, designing streets that better reflect their function and surrounding land use, and ensuring that the needs of pedestrians, residents and vulnerable road users are fully taken into account.
The strategy also reinforces that road safety is a shared responsibility between central Government, local authorities, the police, industry and communities. Central Government provide the legislative framework, guidance and funding, while local authorities are empowered to design and deliver place-specific solutions based on local conditions and priorities.
I would therefore strongly encourage continued engagement between residents, local councillors, Surrey county council and Surrey police to ensure that the concerns raised through this petition are fully considered and that appropriate measures are assessed and, where necessary, taken forward. The Department will continue to support local authorities through updated guidance, data-led approaches and the wider implementation of the road safety strategy to help ensure roads are safer for everyone.
I would be happy to meet the Member to discuss the case he raises further, and thank him for raising this important issue.