To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Bash Back
Friday 23rd January 2026

Asked by: Baroness Falkner of Margravine (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many incidents relating to the group Bash Back have been recorded by (1) the Metropolitan Police, and (2) other police forces, in each year from 2023 to 2026.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

This government upholds the democratic right that people must be free to peacefully express their views, but they must do so within the bounds of the law.

Where the activity of protestors breaks the law, the police have the powers they need to respond.

It would not be appropriate for Ministers to intervene in those operational decisions, but we continue to work closely with policing to ensure they have the right capabilities and support in place to keep the public safe and uphold the law.

There are a number of ongoing police investigations and court proceedings relating to potential criminal behaviour of individuals associated with the protest group, Bash Back. However, this process is independent of government and the Home Office does not hold complete data for arrests, charges, convictions or criminal justice outcomes.


Written Question
Bash Back
Friday 23rd January 2026

Asked by: Baroness Falkner of Margravine (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the activities of the group Bash Back, and what steps they are taking to prevent theft and destruction of property by that group.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

This government upholds the democratic right that people must be free to peacefully express their views, but they must do so within the bounds of the law.

Where the activity of protestors breaks the law, the police have the powers they need to respond.

It would not be appropriate for Ministers to intervene in those operational decisions, but we continue to work closely with policing to ensure they have the right capabilities and support in place to keep the public safe and uphold the law.

There are a number of ongoing police investigations and court proceedings relating to potential criminal behaviour of individuals associated with the protest group, Bash Back. However, this process is independent of government and the Home Office does not hold complete data for arrests, charges, convictions or criminal justice outcomes.


Written Question
Bash Back
Friday 23rd January 2026

Asked by: Baroness Falkner of Margravine (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what information they, and the Metropolitan and other police forces, have on the identities of members of the group Bash Back.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

This government upholds the democratic right that people must be free to peacefully express their views, but they must do so within the bounds of the law.

Where the activity of protestors breaks the law, the police have the powers they need to respond.

It would not be appropriate for Ministers to intervene in those operational decisions, but we continue to work closely with policing to ensure they have the right capabilities and support in place to keep the public safe and uphold the law.

There are a number of ongoing police investigations and court proceedings relating to potential criminal behaviour of individuals associated with the protest group, Bash Back. However, this process is independent of government and the Home Office does not hold complete data for arrests, charges, convictions or criminal justice outcomes.


Written Question
Bash Back: Convictions
Friday 23rd January 2026

Asked by: Baroness Falkner of Margravine (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many members of the group Bash Back have been convicted of a crime relating to that group.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

This government upholds the democratic right that people must be free to peacefully express their views, but they must do so within the bounds of the law.

Where the activity of protestors breaks the law, the police have the powers they need to respond.

It would not be appropriate for Ministers to intervene in those operational decisions, but we continue to work closely with policing to ensure they have the right capabilities and support in place to keep the public safe and uphold the law.

There are a number of ongoing police investigations and court proceedings relating to potential criminal behaviour of individuals associated with the protest group, Bash Back. However, this process is independent of government and the Home Office does not hold complete data for arrests, charges, convictions or criminal justice outcomes.


Written Question
Islamophobia
Wednesday 21st January 2026

Asked by: Baroness Falkner of Margravine (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 14 January (HL13089), whether they will now answer the question put; namely, which public authorities are expected to adopt their definition of anti-Muslim hatred/Islamophobia.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Ministers are still in the process of carefully considering the independent Working Group’s advice regarding a non-statutory definition of anti-Muslim hatred/Islamophobia. Government will confirm next steps in due course.


Written Question
Islamophobia
Wednesday 21st January 2026

Asked by: Baroness Falkner of Margravine (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 14 January (HL13088), whether they will now answer the question put; namely, when they will publish their definition of anti-Muslim hatred/Islamophobia.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Ministers are still in the process of carefully considering the independent Working Group’s advice regarding a non-statutory definition of anti-Muslim hatred/Islamophobia. Government will confirm next steps in due course.


Written Question
Islamophobia
Wednesday 21st January 2026

Asked by: Baroness Falkner of Margravine (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 14 January (HL13090), whether they will now answer the question put; namely, whether they plan to publish examples of practices and biases within institutions that they consider to be relevant conduct under their definition of anti-Muslim hatred/Islamophobia.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Ministers are still in the process of carefully considering the independent Working Group’s advice regarding a non-statutory definition of anti-Muslim hatred/Islamophobia. Government will confirm next steps in due course.


Written Question
Islamophobia
Wednesday 21st January 2026

Asked by: Baroness Falkner of Margravine (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 14 January (HL13091), whether they will now answer the question put; namely, whether they plan to carry out a public consultation in relation to their definition of anti-Muslim hatred/Islamophobia.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Ministers are still in the process of carefully considering the independent Working Group’s advice regarding a non-statutory definition of anti-Muslim hatred/Islamophobia. Government will confirm next steps in due course.


Written Question
Islamophobia
Wednesday 14th January 2026

Asked by: Baroness Falkner of Margravine (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government which public authorities are expected to adopt their definition of anti-Muslim hatred/Islamophobia.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The independent Working Group have now provided their advice to Ministers who are carefully taking the time to review and consider the advice carefully before confirming next steps in due course.

Any definition used by government will be non-statutory. It will enable government and other relevant bodies to have a greater understanding of unacceptable treatment and prejudice against Muslim communities.

The published terms of reference for the Working Group were clear that their advice on a definition must be compatible with the unchanging right of British citizens to exercise freedom of speech and expression.


Written Question
Islamophobia
Wednesday 14th January 2026

Asked by: Baroness Falkner of Margravine (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government when they will publish their definition of anti-Muslim hatred/Islamophobia.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The independent Working Group have now provided their advice to Ministers who are carefully taking the time to review and consider the advice carefully before confirming next steps in due course.

Any definition used by government will be non-statutory. It will enable government and other relevant bodies to have a greater understanding of unacceptable treatment and prejudice against Muslim communities.

The published terms of reference for the Working Group were clear that their advice on a definition must be compatible with the unchanging right of British citizens to exercise freedom of speech and expression.