Information between 10th March 2025 - 19th April 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 141 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 135 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 158 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 283 Noes - 177 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 165 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 179 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 157 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 183 Noes - 234 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 339 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 229 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 207 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 237 |
|
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 168 |
|
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 167 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 224 Noes - 267 |
|
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 234 |
|
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 167 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 257 |
|
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 116 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 43 Noes - 120 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 105 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 19 Noes - 112 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 104 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 51 Noes - 106 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 121 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 49 Noes - 129 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 142 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 59 Noes - 148 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 148 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 242 Noes - 157 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 216 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Livestock: Animal Housing
Asked by: Baroness Gale (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 20th March 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they intend to phase out the use of cages for farmed animals and to explore introducing animal welfare labelling, following the European Commission's recent announcement on these measures. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) We remain firmly committed to maintaining and improving animal welfare and want to work closely with the farming sector to deliver high standards.
The use of cages and other close confinement systems for farmed animals is an issue which we are currently considering very carefully.
A public consultation on fairer food labelling was undertaken between March and May 2024 by the previous Government. We are now carefully considering all responses before deciding on next steps and will respond to this consultation in due course. |
|
Animal Products: Labelling
Asked by: Baroness Gale (Labour - Life peer) Monday 31st March 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that a veterinary agreement with the European Union includes protections to ensure that the UK can implement mandatory animal welfare method-of-production labelling, including on imports. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government is committed to resetting our EU relationship, including by seeking to negotiate an SPS agreement. We have been clear that an SPS agreement could boost trade and deliver significant benefits on both sides. It’s too early to discuss any specific areas in detail and we will not be providing a running commentary on discussions with the EU.
This Government was elected on a mandate to introduce the most ambitious plans to improve animal welfare in a generation.
A public consultation on proposals to improve and extend current mandatory method of production labelling was undertaken last year by the previous Government. We are now carefully considering all responses before deciding on next steps and will respond to this consultation in due course. |