To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 14 Nov 2022
Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill

"My Lords, I rise to speak to my noble friend Lord Wallace of Saltaire’s contention that Clause 8 should not stand part of the Bill. He is back from his holidays but is speaking at the funeral of a very old friend in Bradford. He is very regretful that he …..."
Baroness Garden of Frognal - View Speech

View all Baroness Garden of Frognal (LD - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 07 Nov 2022
Family: Protective Effect

"Following on from the right reverend Prelate’s Question, the commissioner highlighted that nearly all the children her team helps have significant mental health issues and struggle to access timely and consistent support from CAMHS, so will the Government seriously tackle better access to mental health services as a priority to …..."
Baroness Garden of Frognal - View Speech

View all Baroness Garden of Frognal (LD - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Family: Protective Effect

Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 01 Nov 2022
Education: Philosophy

"My Lords, when I was at a French primary school many years ago, philosophy was taught at all stages in French schools, as the noble Lord just said. I do not think it did us any harm. With today’s students apparently really reluctant to discuss anything with which they disagree, …..."
Baroness Garden of Frognal - View Speech

View all Baroness Garden of Frognal (LD - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Education: Philosophy

Written Question
Turing Scheme
Tuesday 16th August 2022

Asked by: Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask Her Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to simplifying the application forms for the Turing Scheme.

Answered by Baroness Barran - Shadow Minister (Education)

The success rate of schools applying to participate in the Turing Scheme over the two years the scheme has operated are:

  • 2021/22 academic year: 131 schools applied, 114 were successful, 87% success rate, which equated to 5,139 individual student placements.
  • 2022/23 academic year: 157 schools applied, 70 were successful, 45% success rate, which equated to 4,721 individual student placements.

All applications were independently assessed by sector experts, who ensured all successful projects met the quality standards required. 70 applications failed on the levelling up criterion. Others had less well-developed projects. This could be due to some of those applicants having less experience in designing projects of this type and securing applying for funding for them. 67% of applicants for the 2022/23 academic year were new applicants, and 71% of applicants that failed were new applicants.

The Turing Scheme has a strong focus on supporting levelling up by providing opportunities for pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds. In the 2021/22 academic year, 48% of 41,000 approved placements for all sectors, which includes schools, further education/vocational education and training (FE/VET), and higher education (HE) were for participants from disadvantaged backgrounds. 52% of 38,000 approved placements for all sectors in the 2022/23 academic year are for participants from disadvantaged backgrounds. The Turing Scheme uses a range of measures based on sector standards across the UK to define what we mean by participants from disadvantaged backgrounds. These are listed in full on the Turing Scheme website and can be found here: https://www.turing-scheme.org.uk/about/widening-access/.

The tables below show the percentage of placements allocated for participants from disadvantaged backgrounds, by sector, for the 2021/22 and 2022/23 academic years.

Table 1: Placements by sector for the 2021/22 academic year

Sector

HE

FE/VET

Schools

Totals

Total no. of participants

28,997

6,888

5,139

41,024

No. of participants from disadvantaged backgrounds

13,817

3,843

2,053

19,713

% of participants from disadvantaged backgrounds

47.6%

55.8%

39.9%

48.1%

Table 2: Placements by sector for the 2022/23 academic year

Sector

HE

FE/VET

Schools

Totals

Total no. of participants

23,986

9,605

4,721

38,312

No. of participants from disadvantaged backgrounds

12,356

5,554

2,022

19,932

% of participants from disadvantaged backgrounds

52%

58%

43%

52%

A full breakdown is provided on the Turing Scheme website.

The application form for the Turing Scheme is framed around the main objectives of the scheme, requiring applicants to set out how their planned projects will support priorities, including Global Britain and levelling up. This year’s application form entailed fewer questions than last year’s, in response to feedback from applicants.

The department will keep engaging with stakeholders so that we can continue to develop the scheme in subsequent years, to ensure it delivers on its objectives, supports students to make the most of their international experiences, and is aligned with government priorities. This will include the application experience.


Written Question
Turing Scheme: Disadvantaged
Tuesday 16th August 2022

Asked by: Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the percentage of disadvantaged participants by sector in the Turing Scheme.

Answered by Baroness Barran - Shadow Minister (Education)

The success rate of schools applying to participate in the Turing Scheme over the two years the scheme has operated are:

  • 2021/22 academic year: 131 schools applied, 114 were successful, 87% success rate, which equated to 5,139 individual student placements.
  • 2022/23 academic year: 157 schools applied, 70 were successful, 45% success rate, which equated to 4,721 individual student placements.

All applications were independently assessed by sector experts, who ensured all successful projects met the quality standards required. 70 applications failed on the levelling up criterion. Others had less well-developed projects. This could be due to some of those applicants having less experience in designing projects of this type and securing applying for funding for them. 67% of applicants for the 2022/23 academic year were new applicants, and 71% of applicants that failed were new applicants.

The Turing Scheme has a strong focus on supporting levelling up by providing opportunities for pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds. In the 2021/22 academic year, 48% of 41,000 approved placements for all sectors, which includes schools, further education/vocational education and training (FE/VET), and higher education (HE) were for participants from disadvantaged backgrounds. 52% of 38,000 approved placements for all sectors in the 2022/23 academic year are for participants from disadvantaged backgrounds. The Turing Scheme uses a range of measures based on sector standards across the UK to define what we mean by participants from disadvantaged backgrounds. These are listed in full on the Turing Scheme website and can be found here: https://www.turing-scheme.org.uk/about/widening-access/.

The tables below show the percentage of placements allocated for participants from disadvantaged backgrounds, by sector, for the 2021/22 and 2022/23 academic years.

Table 1: Placements by sector for the 2021/22 academic year

Sector

HE

FE/VET

Schools

Totals

Total no. of participants

28,997

6,888

5,139

41,024

No. of participants from disadvantaged backgrounds

13,817

3,843

2,053

19,713

% of participants from disadvantaged backgrounds

47.6%

55.8%

39.9%

48.1%

Table 2: Placements by sector for the 2022/23 academic year

Sector

HE

FE/VET

Schools

Totals

Total no. of participants

23,986

9,605

4,721

38,312

No. of participants from disadvantaged backgrounds

12,356

5,554

2,022

19,932

% of participants from disadvantaged backgrounds

52%

58%

43%

52%

A full breakdown is provided on the Turing Scheme website.

The application form for the Turing Scheme is framed around the main objectives of the scheme, requiring applicants to set out how their planned projects will support priorities, including Global Britain and levelling up. This year’s application form entailed fewer questions than last year’s, in response to feedback from applicants.

The department will keep engaging with stakeholders so that we can continue to develop the scheme in subsequent years, to ensure it delivers on its objectives, supports students to make the most of their international experiences, and is aligned with government priorities. This will include the application experience.


Written Question
Turing Scheme
Tuesday 16th August 2022

Asked by: Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the success rate of schools applying to the Turing Scheme.

Answered by Baroness Barran - Shadow Minister (Education)

The success rate of schools applying to participate in the Turing Scheme over the two years the scheme has operated are:

  • 2021/22 academic year: 131 schools applied, 114 were successful, 87% success rate, which equated to 5,139 individual student placements.
  • 2022/23 academic year: 157 schools applied, 70 were successful, 45% success rate, which equated to 4,721 individual student placements.

All applications were independently assessed by sector experts, who ensured all successful projects met the quality standards required. 70 applications failed on the levelling up criterion. Others had less well-developed projects. This could be due to some of those applicants having less experience in designing projects of this type and securing applying for funding for them. 67% of applicants for the 2022/23 academic year were new applicants, and 71% of applicants that failed were new applicants.

The Turing Scheme has a strong focus on supporting levelling up by providing opportunities for pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds. In the 2021/22 academic year, 48% of 41,000 approved placements for all sectors, which includes schools, further education/vocational education and training (FE/VET), and higher education (HE) were for participants from disadvantaged backgrounds. 52% of 38,000 approved placements for all sectors in the 2022/23 academic year are for participants from disadvantaged backgrounds. The Turing Scheme uses a range of measures based on sector standards across the UK to define what we mean by participants from disadvantaged backgrounds. These are listed in full on the Turing Scheme website and can be found here: https://www.turing-scheme.org.uk/about/widening-access/.

The tables below show the percentage of placements allocated for participants from disadvantaged backgrounds, by sector, for the 2021/22 and 2022/23 academic years.

Table 1: Placements by sector for the 2021/22 academic year

Sector

HE

FE/VET

Schools

Totals

Total no. of participants

28,997

6,888

5,139

41,024

No. of participants from disadvantaged backgrounds

13,817

3,843

2,053

19,713

% of participants from disadvantaged backgrounds

47.6%

55.8%

39.9%

48.1%

Table 2: Placements by sector for the 2022/23 academic year

Sector

HE

FE/VET

Schools

Totals

Total no. of participants

23,986

9,605

4,721

38,312

No. of participants from disadvantaged backgrounds

12,356

5,554

2,022

19,932

% of participants from disadvantaged backgrounds

52%

58%

43%

52%

A full breakdown is provided on the Turing Scheme website.

The application form for the Turing Scheme is framed around the main objectives of the scheme, requiring applicants to set out how their planned projects will support priorities, including Global Britain and levelling up. This year’s application form entailed fewer questions than last year’s, in response to feedback from applicants.

The department will keep engaging with stakeholders so that we can continue to develop the scheme in subsequent years, to ensure it delivers on its objectives, supports students to make the most of their international experiences, and is aligned with government priorities. This will include the application experience.


Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 18 Jul 2022
Schools Bill [HL]

"My Lords, Amendment 77 is in my name, and I am delighted to have the support of the noble Lord, Lord Lucas. This is a very modest amendment so I hope the Minister can agree it without too much difficulty—one always lives in hope in this place.

Home educators save …..."

Baroness Garden of Frognal - View Speech

View all Baroness Garden of Frognal (LD - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Schools Bill [HL]

Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 12 Jul 2022
Schools Bill [HL]

"My Lords, the amendment proposed is to insert the words on the Marshalled List at Clause 1 on page 2 at the end of line 18. If I am wrong, I apologise...."
Baroness Garden of Frognal - View Speech

View all Baroness Garden of Frognal (LD - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Schools Bill [HL]

Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 12 Jul 2022
Schools Bill [HL]

"I think Amendment 4 is in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Addington.

I am so sorry. I have the name of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Judge, here, but it is not against an amendment.

Amendment 4..."

Baroness Garden of Frognal - View Speech

View all Baroness Garden of Frognal (LD - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Schools Bill [HL]

Speech in Lords Chamber - Wed 29 Jun 2022
Schools: Citizenship Education

"My Lords, if we wish our young people to emerge from school with skills for life, citizenship education is surely essential. Following on from the previous question, what progress are the Government making in recruiting citizenship teachers, who are in very short supply?..."
Baroness Garden of Frognal - View Speech

View all Baroness Garden of Frognal (LD - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Schools: Citizenship Education