To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Coronavirus: Vaccination
Friday 16th April 2021

Asked by: Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to administer COVID-19 vaccinations in prisons and other places of custody.

Answered by Lord Bethell

Working together with our partners across the secure and detained estate, vaccinations in prisons and detention centres has begun - delivering to the top priority cohorts defined by the Joint Committee on Vaccinations and Immunisations, in line with the rest of the population. As set out in the United Kingdom COVID-19 vaccines delivery plan, Local Vaccination Services are co-ordinating and delivering vaccinations to people who are unable to attend a vaccination site, including prisons and other places of custody.


Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 12 May 2020
Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020

"My Lords, the Minister has explained that the legislation is about to be superseded. The rule of law requires law, brought to both Houses of Parliament as soon as possible. There is enough confusion about what is intended without confusion on the part of citizens and the police as to …..."
Baroness Hamwee - View Speech

View all Baroness Hamwee (LD - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 16 Mar 2020
Covid-19 Update

"My Lords, the Minister referred to a recommendation about people not going to pubs, clubs, and theatres. The Society of London Theatre has been instructed to close all theatres by DCMS tonight, and that is now happening. Is it a recommendation, or an instruction? This is important, not just because …..."
Baroness Hamwee - View Speech

View all Baroness Hamwee (LD - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Covid-19 Update

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 16 Mar 2020
Covid-19 Update

"As there are five seconds left, may I apologise to the House for having failed to declare my interest as a trustee of a theatre when I asked my question?..."
Baroness Hamwee - View Speech

View all Baroness Hamwee (LD - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Covid-19 Update

Written Question
Health Services: Foreign Nationals
Monday 5th February 2018

Asked by: Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they intend to extend the deadline of 31 January for the submission of evidence to the Department of Health's formal review of the National Health Service (Charges to Overseas Visitors) (Amendment) Regulations 2017, having released a list of review questions on 22 December 2017, immediately before an extended holiday period and thus effectively reducing an already short consultation period.

Answered by Lord O'Shaughnessy

The review of ‘The National Health Service (Charges to Overseas Visitors) (Amendment) Regulations 2017’ is not a consultation.

However, the Department recognises the need to ensure that sufficient time is provided for both evidence collection and analysis. The end of January deadline was chosen so that the Department could seek to identify the main impacts on vulnerable groups of the amendment regulations as early in the review process as possible. This will allow more time to further explore these impacts with stakeholders, within the timeframe of the review that has been set out.

The Department has responded to questions from stakeholders about the deadline by saying ‘we recognise that the end of January deadline may not be possible for all organisations due to the issues you have raised. As we previously stated, we are therefore willing to be flexible on this deadline, so while we would appreciate organisations submitting their responses as soon as possible, we will of course still consider the information in responses that are submitted after that.’ The Department has made it clear that evidence submitted within a timeframe that allows it to be taken into account as part of the review will be considered.

The Department has also committed to continue to work with stakeholders to monitor the effects of the charging regulations on vulnerable groups after the review process has concluded. Therefore, if new evidence concerning the impact of the impact of ‘The National Health Service (Charges to Overseas Visitors) (Amendment) Regulations 2017’ is presented to the Department, after the time at which it can be considered as part of the review process, it will be considered in accordance with the Secretary of State’s ongoing duties. The Department does not see any reason to change the position, outlined above, which has already been communicated to stakeholders.


Speech in Lords Chamber - Thu 16 Nov 2017
National Health Service (Charges to Overseas Visitors) (Amendment) Regulations 2017

"My Lords, I thank the organisations that have briefed us. Sending a joint briefing was particularly helpful, not because it reduces the paper but because it increases the force of the content. It came from Asylum Matters, Doctors of the World UK, NAT and Freedom from Torture. We have had …..."
Baroness Hamwee - View Speech

View all Baroness Hamwee (LD - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: National Health Service (Charges to Overseas Visitors) (Amendment) Regulations 2017

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 13 Oct 2014
Ebola

"My Lords, the noble Earl mentioned information to GPs, pharmacists and so on. Can he tell the House anything about information to be given to the general public about the symptoms that we should be looking out for? Obviously I appreciate that one does not want to cause alarm, although …..."
Baroness Hamwee - View Speech

View all Baroness Hamwee (LD - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Ebola