Information between 31st August 2026 - 30th October 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Morgan of Drefelin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 138 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Morgan of Drefelin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Morgan of Drefelin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 163 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Morgan of Drefelin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 120 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 125 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Morgan of Drefelin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 165 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Morgan of Drefelin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 164 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Morgan of Drefelin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 171 |
|
15 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Morgan of Drefelin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 109 |
|
28 Oct 2026 - Railways (Interoperability in Northern Ireland) (Convention on International Carriage by Rail) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context Baroness Morgan of Drefelin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 46 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 20 Noes - 63 |
|
26 Oct 2026 - Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Morgan of Drefelin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 155 |
|
26 Oct 2026 - Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Morgan of Drefelin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 155 |
|
26 Oct 2026 - Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Morgan of Drefelin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 165 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin speeches from: Health Bill
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin contributed 1 speech (347 words) Committee stage (part one) Wednesday 28th October 2026 - Lords Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
|
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin speeches from: Direction of Government
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin contributed 1 speech (90 words) Wednesday 2nd September 2026 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Rare Cancers: Mortality Rates
Asked by: Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 28th October 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government, in light of the national cancer plan for England, published in February 2026, what performance metrics are being used to monitor delivery of the commitment to improve outcomes for rare and less common cancers; and what is the latest reported performance against each metric. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The latest reported survival outcomes for each of the 14 less common cancers referenced in the National Cancer Plan are currently available in the CONCORD-3 study with more up to date data being released in the CONCORD-4 study, which is due to be published by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine shortly. The Department will continue to use National Disease Registration Service published survival data to monitor progress on cancer survival in England and will ensure that we are improving outcomes across all tumour types. We are committed to improving all outcomes, including for the 14 less common cancers referenced, as we continue to implement the commitments set out in the plan. Cancer waiting time performance and early diagnosis data provide good indications on where we are making progress and help to identify low-performing tumour types. Both of these datasets are available publicly. The reformed National Cancer Board is the senior advisory body and governance structure responsible for tracking the progress of the commitments within the plan. The board will maintain momentum, provide challenge and scrutiny to areas of slow progress, and ensure that implementation translates into meaningful improvements for patients, including rare cancer patients. Dr Robert Metcalf has been appointed as the National Clinical Lead for Rare Cancers and will be responsible for providing independent challenge and supporting the delivery of the rare cancer commitments within the plan. |
|
Rare Cancers: Mortality Rates
Asked by: Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 28th October 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what are the latest reported survival outcomes for each of the 14 less common cancers referenced in the national cancer plan for England; and how those outcomes compare with the baseline used when the national cancer plan for England was published. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The latest reported survival outcomes for each of the 14 less common cancers referenced in the National Cancer Plan are currently available in the CONCORD-3 study with more up to date data being released in the CONCORD-4 study, which is due to be published by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine shortly. The Department will continue to use National Disease Registration Service published survival data to monitor progress on cancer survival in England and will ensure that we are improving outcomes across all tumour types. We are committed to improving all outcomes, including for the 14 less common cancers referenced, as we continue to implement the commitments set out in the plan. Cancer waiting time performance and early diagnosis data provide good indications on where we are making progress and help to identify low-performing tumour types. Both of these datasets are available publicly. The reformed National Cancer Board is the senior advisory body and governance structure responsible for tracking the progress of the commitments within the plan. The board will maintain momentum, provide challenge and scrutiny to areas of slow progress, and ensure that implementation translates into meaningful improvements for patients, including rare cancer patients. Dr Robert Metcalf has been appointed as the National Clinical Lead for Rare Cancers and will be responsible for providing independent challenge and supporting the delivery of the rare cancer commitments within the plan. |
|
Rare Cancers: Health Services
Asked by: Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 28th October 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what governance arrangements have been established to oversee implementation of rare and less common cancer commitments within the national cancer plan for England. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The latest reported survival outcomes for each of the 14 less common cancers referenced in the National Cancer Plan are currently available in the CONCORD-3 study with more up to date data being released in the CONCORD-4 study, which is due to be published by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine shortly. The Department will continue to use National Disease Registration Service published survival data to monitor progress on cancer survival in England and will ensure that we are improving outcomes across all tumour types. We are committed to improving all outcomes, including for the 14 less common cancers referenced, as we continue to implement the commitments set out in the plan. Cancer waiting time performance and early diagnosis data provide good indications on where we are making progress and help to identify low-performing tumour types. Both of these datasets are available publicly. The reformed National Cancer Board is the senior advisory body and governance structure responsible for tracking the progress of the commitments within the plan. The board will maintain momentum, provide challenge and scrutiny to areas of slow progress, and ensure that implementation translates into meaningful improvements for patients, including rare cancer patients. Dr Robert Metcalf has been appointed as the National Clinical Lead for Rare Cancers and will be responsible for providing independent challenge and supporting the delivery of the rare cancer commitments within the plan. |
|
Rare Cancers: Health Services
Asked by: Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 28th October 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what the initial priorities are for the role of the new national clinical lead for rare cancers. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The latest reported survival outcomes for each of the 14 less common cancers referenced in the National Cancer Plan are currently available in the CONCORD-3 study with more up to date data being released in the CONCORD-4 study, which is due to be published by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine shortly. The Department will continue to use National Disease Registration Service published survival data to monitor progress on cancer survival in England and will ensure that we are improving outcomes across all tumour types. We are committed to improving all outcomes, including for the 14 less common cancers referenced, as we continue to implement the commitments set out in the plan. Cancer waiting time performance and early diagnosis data provide good indications on where we are making progress and help to identify low-performing tumour types. Both of these datasets are available publicly. The reformed National Cancer Board is the senior advisory body and governance structure responsible for tracking the progress of the commitments within the plan. The board will maintain momentum, provide challenge and scrutiny to areas of slow progress, and ensure that implementation translates into meaningful improvements for patients, including rare cancer patients. Dr Robert Metcalf has been appointed as the National Clinical Lead for Rare Cancers and will be responsible for providing independent challenge and supporting the delivery of the rare cancer commitments within the plan. |
| Bill Documents |
|---|
|
Oct. 27 2026
HL Bill 52-I(Rev) Revised marshalled list for Committee Health Bill 2026-27 Amendment Paper Found: After Clause 11 BARONESS PIDGEON BARONESS MORGAN OF DREFELIN LORD PATEL 41_ After Clause 11, insert |
|
Oct. 26 2026
HL Bill 52-I Marshalled list for Committee Health Bill 2026-27 Amendment Paper Found: After Clause 11 BARONESS PIDGEON BARONESS MORGAN OF DREFELIN LORD PATEL 41_ After Clause 11, insert |
|
Oct. 23 2026
HL Bill 52 Running list of amendments – 23 October 2026 Health Bill 2026-27 Amendment Paper Found: as with a failing local authority. 21 Health Bill After Clause 11 BARONESS PIDGEON BARONESS MORGAN OF DREFELIN |
|
Oct. 22 2026
HL Bill 52 Running list of amendments – 22 October 2026 Health Bill 2026-27 Amendment Paper Found: After Clause 11 BARONESS PIDGEON BARONESS MORGAN OF DREFELIN LORD PATEL _ After Clause 11, insert |
|
Oct. 21 2026
HL Bill 52 Running list of amendments – 21 October 2026 Health Bill 2026-27 Amendment Paper Found: After Clause 11 BARONESS PIDGEON BARONESS MORGAN OF DREFELIN LORD PATEL _ After Clause 11, insert |
|
Oct. 20 2026
HL Bill 52 Running list of amendments – 20 October 2026 Health Bill 2026-27 Amendment Paper Found: After Clause 11 BARONESS PIDGEON BARONESS MORGAN OF DREFELIN LORD PATEL _ After Clause 11, insert |
|
Oct. 19 2026
HL Bill 52 Running list of amendments – 19 October 2026 Health Bill 2026-27 Amendment Paper Found: After Clause 11 BARONESS PIDGEON BARONESS MORGAN OF DREFELIN _ After Clause 11, insert the following |
|
Oct. 16 2026
HL Bill 52 Running list of amendments – 16 October 2026 Health Bill 2026-27 Amendment Paper Found: compliance, and intended outcomes. 13 Health Bill After Clause 11 BARONESS PIDGEON BARONESS MORGAN OF DREFELIN |