All 1 Debates between Baroness Sharp of Guildford and Lord Sassoon

Public Expenditure: Review of Commitments

Debate between Baroness Sharp of Guildford and Lord Sassoon
Thursday 17th June 2010

(13 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Sassoon Portrait Lord Sassoon
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am grateful for that clarification. However, given that Sheffield Forgemasters is one of the very few firms in the world capable of making the largest forgings required to supply critical components to the civil nuclear industry, there is every expectation that there may be a private sector solution out there. I stress the broader point about jobs: we need to underpin the economy on a firm foundation, where the private sector can go forward and create the jobs that we need, whether in steel or many other industries.

Baroness Sharp of Guildford Portrait Baroness Sharp of Guildford
- Hansard - -

My Lords, perhaps I may press the Minister a little further about the Stonehenge visitor centre. Stonehenge is a world heritage site and attracts the most visitors within the UK. The current visitor centre is a disgrace. Plans have been under way for a long time and it has taken a long time to get the planning permissions in place, which has now just been achieved. Of the money to be spent, only £10 million is coming from Her Majesty’s Government; the rest is coming from English Heritage and other private sources. Is it really necessary to cancel this now?

Lord Sassoon Portrait Lord Sassoon
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank my noble friend Lady Sharp. I was at Stonehenge last year and it is clearly one of the most inspiring sites in this country. However, we have to be realistic about the predicament in which the economy has been left by the previous Government. There are certain projects that we simply cannot afford and which do not represent good value for money. The £25 million Stonehenge visitor centre is one that fails the test.