Baroness Sharp of Guildford

Liberal Democrat - Former Member for Life peer

Became Member: 1st August 1998


Social Mobility Committee
11th Jun 2015 - 16th Mar 2016
Science and Technology Committee (Lords)
16th May 2012 - 30th Mar 2015
European Union Committee
24th Nov 2009 - 8th Nov 2010
Science and Technology: Sub-Committee I
6th Jun 2005 - 28th Nov 2008
Science and Technology Committee (Lords)
3rd Dec 2003 - 30th Oct 2007


Division Voting information

Baroness Sharp of Guildford has voted in 686 divisions, and 11 times against the majority of their Party.

9 Dec 2014 - Criminal Justice and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Sharp of Guildford voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 26 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 52 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 240
7 Apr 2014 - Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Sharp of Guildford voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 23 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 39 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 242 Noes - 180
29 Jan 2014 - Children and Families Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Sharp of Guildford voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 27 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 28 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 222 Noes - 197
24 Apr 2013 - Procedure of the House - View Vote Context
Baroness Sharp of Guildford voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 26 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 37 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 243
22 Apr 2013 - Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Sharp of Guildford voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 18 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 30 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 168
4 Mar 2013 - Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Sharp of Guildford voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 45 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 179
18 Dec 2012 - Crime and Courts Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Sharp of Guildford voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 49 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 159
19 Nov 2012 - Justice and Security Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Sharp of Guildford voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 52 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 200
22 Oct 2012 - Local Government Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Sharp of Guildford voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 16 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 28 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 165
25 Jan 2012 - Welfare Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Sharp of Guildford voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 16 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 30 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 128
23 Jan 2012 - Welfare Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Sharp of Guildford voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 17 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 41 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 222 Noes - 250
View All Baroness Sharp of Guildford Division Votes

All Debates

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Lord Nash (Conservative)
(25 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Department for Education
(125 debate contributions)
Home Office
(28 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
Legislation Debates
Baroness Sharp of Guildford has not made any spoken contributions to legislative debate
View all Baroness Sharp of Guildford's debates

Lords initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Baroness Sharp of Guildford, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.


Baroness Sharp of Guildford has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Baroness Sharp of Guildford has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 24 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
14 Other Department Questions
18th Jan 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the resource cost charge in England of (1) full-time fee loans in higher education, (2) full-time maintenance loans in higher education, (3) part-time fee loans in higher education, and (4) adult further education fee loans, for those aged 24 and over who are studying on Level 3 and 4 courses.

We estimate that the Resource Accounting and Budgeting (RAB) charge for full time tuition fee and maintenance loans, and part time fee loans, is between 20% and 25%.


We estimate that the Resource Accounting and Budgeting (RAB) charge for Advanced Learner Loans is around 40%. BIS is collecting data on learners as it emerges and based on this data we regularly review and update the RAB charge estimate for Advanced Learner Loans.


These estimates take into account the changes to student finance and the new HM Treasury discount rate used to value the student loan book announced at Spending Review and Autumn Statement 2015. We will update our estimates in summer 2016 and publish these at the same time as BIS accounts.



3rd Dec 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether the annual £210 million ring-fenced funding for adult community education is to be continued; and if not, what level of funding such community education will receive in future.

We have protected the core adult skills participation budget in cash terms, at £1.5 billion. Further details on what the settlement means for the Further Education sector is set out in the Skills Funding Letter.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Minister of State (Cabinet Office)
3rd Dec 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many (1) 16 year olds, (2) 17 year olds, and (3) 18 year olds, started an apprenticeship in (a) England, and (b) each region in England in the latest period for which figures are available.

Table 1 shows Apprenticeship starts in 2014/15 by learners aged 16-18 by region and age.

Table 1: 16-18 Apprenticeship starts by age and region, 2014/15







Region

Age

16

17

18


North East

1,850

2,910

3,820


North West

4,710

6,660

8,620


Yorkshire and the Humber

3,670

5,500

7,200


East Midlands

2,970

4,410

5,450


West Midlands

2,960

4,960

6,490


East of England

2,970

4,070

5,580


London

1,820

3,350

4,810


South East

3,560

5,360

7,270


South West

3,110

4,310

5,740


England Total

27,600

41,500

55,000







Other

400

530

620







Grand Total

28,000

42,100

55,600


Notes:






1) Volumes are rounded to the nearest 10 except totals which are rounded to the nearest hundred.

2) Age is calculated based on age at start of the programme.

3) Age is based upon self-declaration by the learner.

4) Region is based upon the home postcode of the learner. Where the postcode is outside of England, learners are included in the 'Other' category. Where postcode is not known this is also included in the 'Other' category.

5) These figures are based on the geographic boundaries of regions as of May 2010.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Minister of State (Cabinet Office)
3rd Dec 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the breakdown of the £172 million Learner Support budget of the Skills Funding Agency for 2015–16.


The Learner Support budget is predominantly demand-led and meets the costs of Discretionary Learner Support for grant-funded learners and the Advanced Learner Loan Bursary Fund for loan-funded learners. It also covers the government’s costs of the Professional and Career Development Loan scheme and Dance and Drama Awards for young adults.


The forecasted total expenditure for the 2015-16 financial year currently stands at around £132 million. Discretionary Learner Support assists the most learners and may equate to nearly £86 million, while the Bursary Fund may equate to about £35 million of the expenditure. The remainder will be for the costs of Professional and Career Development Loans (c£2.5 million) and Dance and Drama Awards (c£8.5 million).


Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Minister of State (Cabinet Office)
15th Sep 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their estimate of the proportion of student loans awarded to students undertaking (1) full-time, and (2) part-time, bachelor degrees that will never be repaid.

(1) We estimate that the proportion of the value of full time loans which will not be repaid is around 45%.

(2) Our current published estimate is that around 65% of the value of part time loans will not be repaid. We will update our estimate as we get more information on the characteristics of the students taking out these loans, and, in due course, actual repayments.

The Department does not produce separate estimates for different levels of Higher Education qualifications. The figures mentioned above cover all higher education loans.

7th Jul 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, for the latest year for which figures are available, what is the total level of funding for apprenticeships in England available for those aged (1) 16–18, and (2) 19 and over; and for each age group, how much was allocated to engineering apprenticeships.

Funding responsibility for the Apprenticeship Programme is shared between the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills which funds adult apprenticeships and the Department for Education which funds 16-18 year olds. This is a demand-led budget and not allocated to any particular sector, employers and providers are relied upon to work together to offer sufficient opportunities to meet local demand.

For the 2015/16 financial year, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills will provide £770million to fund apprenticeships for those aged 19+ and the Department for Education will provide £776.5million to fund apprenticeships for those aged 16-18[1].


[1] These figures do not include funding for the Employer Ownership Programme

Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Minister of State (Cabinet Office)
7th Jul 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the cost of (1) full, and (2) partial, maintenance grants for full-time undergraduate students in higher education in England studying at (a) universities, and (b) further education colleges.

The Student Loans Company (SLC) publishes statistics according to the domicile of applicants rather than the country of study. Information on English domiciled applicants awarded Maintenance Grants for study at UK providers is published annually by SLC in the Statistical First Release ‘Student Support for Higher Education England’.

http://www.slc.co.uk/media/855703/slcsfr052014.pdf

The amount awarded in Maintenance Grants to English domiciled applicants at publicly-funded providers in the UK by type of provider in the academic year 2013/14 has been provided in the table.

Maintenance Grants (1) awarded (2) to English applicants by provider type (3)

Publicly-funded providers of Higher Education (4)

Academic year 2013/14

Amount awarded (£ million)

Provider type

Full Maintenance Grant

Partial Maintenance Grant

All Maintenance Grants

Higher Education Institutions

1,124.8

221.0

1,345.8

Further Education Colleges

101.0

12.1

113.1

All publicly-funded providers

1,225.8

233.1

1,458.9

Source: Student Loans Company

Notes:

(1) Figures include Special Support Grants, which are payable in place of Maintenance Grants to vulnerable students who may otherwise have their DWP benefits reduced.

(2) Awards do not necessarily translate into payments. An awarded applicant will only receive payments once SLC have received confirmation from the student’s provider that the student has been registered on the course.

(3) Provider name is the name of the parent institution to the main institution associated with a course as recorded in the SLC administrative system. A course may be held at a campus of the main institution or at a franchise location.

(4) In addition to the £1,458.9 million awarded in Maintenance Grants to applicants at publicly-funded providers, there was also £133.3 million awarded to applicants at Alternative Providers in 2013/14, however a breakdown of these awards by provider type is not readily available.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Minister of State (Cabinet Office)
7th Jul 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how decisions about allocating funding to engineering apprenticeships for those aged (1) 16–18, and (2) 19 and over, are made.

Apprenticeships are paid jobs with high quality training. The locations and sectors where apprenticeships are available are determined by employers offering opportunities and recruiting apprentices.

We are committed to 3 million apprenticeship starts during the next 5 years and we will work with employers, including in the engineering sector, to provide more apprenticeship opportunities, particularly for young people.

Through the Skills Funding Agency, the Government provides funding for training where employers hire an apprentice and currently fully funds apprenticeship training for 16 – 18 year olds and up to 50% of apprenticeship training for over 19s.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Minister of State (Cabinet Office)
7th Jul 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many students in England are studying (1) full-time undergraduate degrees, (2) foundation degrees, and (3) other undergraduate degrees; and of each group, how many students are studying at (a) universities, and (b) further education colleges.

Information derived by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) on the distribution of undergraduate students taught at Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) and Further Education Colleges (FECs) is provided in the table.

The figures in the table describe the position as at the 8 July 2015 and are subject to change. HEFCE will be publishing their final estimates in the Summer.

Full-Person Equivalent of undergraduate students(1,2) on full-time courses by type of teaching institution

Higher Education and Further Education Institutions in England

Academic year 2013/14

Position as at 8 July 2015

Teaching Institution3

Higher Education Institutions

Further Education Colleges(4,5)

Total

First degree

1,084,170

23,775

1,107,945

Foundation degree

14,205

30,895

45,100

Other undergraduate

18,925

12,600

31,525

Total Undergraduate

1,117,305

67,270

1,184,575

Source: HEFCE analysis of the Higher Education Statistics Agency’s (HESA) Student Record and the Skills Funding Agency’s (SFA) Individualised Learner Record (ILR)

Table notes:

1. Figures exclude undergraduate students taught at Alternative providers.

2. Full Person Equivalent (FPEs) counts apportion students if they are studying more than one subject or at more than one teaching institution.

3. Under franchising arrangements the teaching institution may differ from the registering institution.

4. Figures for FECs refer to students participating in prescribed courses of Higher Education.

5. HEFCE apply statistical methods to the registered population at Further Education Colleges in order to make sure that the population used is comparable to that returned by the Higher Education Statistics Agency.

6. Figures are rounded to the nearest 5.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Minister of State (Cabinet Office)
7th Jul 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, for the latest year for which figures are available, how many people in England aged (1) 16, (2) 17, (3) 18, (4) 19–21, (5) 22–24, and (6) 25 and over, started an apprenticeship; and for each age group, how many started engineering apprenticeships.

Table 1 shows the number of apprenticeship starts in 2013/14 by age for all apprenticeships and for the engineering and manufacturing sector subject area.

Table 1: Apprenticeship Starts by age (2013/14)

Age

All Apprenticeship Starts

Engineering and Manufacturing

16

25,500

6,900

17

39,000

8,500

18

55,100

10,800

19-21

101,000

15,500

22-24

58,100

7,000

25+

161,600

16,100

Total

440,400

64,800

Notes:

(1) The source is the Individualised Learner Record.

(2) Volumes are rounded to the nearest hundred.

(3) Age is based upon self-declaration by the learner and is defined as age at start of apprenticeship.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Minister of State (Cabinet Office)
15th Jan 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many and what proportion of (1) 16 year-olds, (2) 17 year-olds, and (3) 18 year-olds started an apprenticeship in England in 2012–13 and 2013–14 in hairdressing and barbering.

Table one shows the number apprenticeship starts for ages 16, 17 and 18 in 2012/13 and 2013/14 in the hairdressing and barbering frameworks. Information on the proportion of each age group that start an apprenticeship is not available from the official data.

Table 1 Apprenticeship Starts by Age and Framework, 2012/13 to 2013/14

Framework

Age

2012/13

2013/14

Barbering

16

70

100

17

200

180

18

360

350

Hairdressing

16

4,100

3,890

17

3,170

3,200

18

3,100

3,060

Notes

1) The source is the Individualised Learner Record.

2) Volumes are rounded to the nearest 10.

3) Age is calculated based on age at start of the programme.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Minister of State (Cabinet Office)
11th Jun 2014
To ask Her Majesty's Government why the Student Loans Company and HM Revenue and Customs joint accounting system is able to continue deducting repayments on loans via the PAYE system even when repayment has been completed; and why in such circumstances it is necessary for the individual customer to alert them to the situation and to reclaim overpayment.

It is possible for borrowers with Income Contingent Repayment (ICR) loans nearing the end of their repayment term to over-repay their loans because there is a time lag between the deductions from borrowers pay (by employers), HMRC's annual process for student loan repayment accounting and the student loans Company (SLC) subsequently receiving payment information from HMRC. As a consequence it is possible for people to over repay before the SLC becomes aware that their repayments should stop.

Because of this, SLC notifies borrowers in the final 23 months of repayment that they may opt out of the PAYE system and complete their loan repayments by Direct Debit (DD). This would ensure they do not over repay their loan. If borrowers choose not take up DD repayment it is likely that they will over repay. Borrowers are advised to monitor their own repayments. If they can demonstrate to SLC that they have paid enough by providing evidence, such as payslips, SLC can then ask HMRC to issue a "stop" notice to employers and refund any over repayments at the earliest opportunity.

The SLC provides guidance and tools to help borrowers calculate their loan balance and when they are likely to repay their loan in full. The SLC refunds all over repayments to borrowers' bank accounts.

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon
Minister of State (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)
11th Jun 2014
To ask Her Majesty's Government why the Student Loans Company does not provide up-to-date online information about the state of an account, detailing all repayments made into the account via the PAYE system since the last statement was issued.

HMRC collates employer information on student loan deductions at the end of each tax year and provides this information in P14 “end of year summaries” to the SLC. The SLC calculate interest and statements are issued to borrowers, advising them of their deductions, interest and outstanding balance at the end of the tax year. This process is repeated annually until all student loan repayments are collected.

The repayment information held by the SLC will, as a result of this system, be accurate to the April of the previous tax year. The SLC is not in a position to provide an accurate settlement of a borrower's balance more recently than the previous April. However, the borrower can track and monitor their own settlement balance online if they retain a note of all their repayment deductions made over the tax year.

HMRC, BIS and SLC are currently discussing arrangements to share student loan repayment information more quickly, but there is no mechanism to do so in the current tax system and necessary changes will take some time to implement.

Viscount Younger of Leckie
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions)
18th Jan 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many 18 to 21-year olds in England are (1) in full-time education, and (a) employed, (b) unemployed, and (c) economically inactive, and (2) not in full-time education and (a) employed, (b) unemployed, and (c) economically inactive.

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the Authority to reply.

18th Jan 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what was the overall level of public funding for apprenticeships in (1) England, and (2) the construction sector, for apprentices aged (a) 16 to 18, (b) 19 to 24, and (c) 24 and over, for the latest year for which information is available.

Funding responsibility for the Apprenticeship Programme is shared between the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills which funds adult apprenticeships and the Department for Education which funds 16-18 year olds. This is a demand-led budget and not allocated to any particular sector. Employers and providers are relied upon to work together to offer sufficient opportunities to meet local demand.

For the 2015/16 financial year, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills will provide £770million to fund apprenticeships for those aged 19+ and the Department for Education will provide £797.5million to fund apprenticeships for those aged 16-18.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Minister of State (Cabinet Office)
3rd Dec 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether, in developing their plans for improving the careers service for young people up to the age of 18, they have consulted the National Careers Service about possible collaboration.

The Department for Education works closely with the National Careers Service (NCS), which supports young people directly through a website, telephone helpline and webchat service and through a brokerage role with schools and employers.


We consulted the NCS in advance of establishing The Careers & Enterprise Company, and since then the two organisations have worked together to understand where and how services can be coordinated to ensure that they complement each other.


In the spring we will publish a strategy for improved careers provision for young people and we are engaging with the NCS as we develop our proposals. In particular the NCS will support one of our key aims, which is to ensure that young people and their parents or carers can access the information they need to make informed decisions on their education, training and employment options.

3rd Dec 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, in the main expenditure estimates of July for the Department for Education, what is the breakdown of the £4 billion budget line "other" currently assigned to Education Funding Agency funding of academy schools.

We refer to both the £4 billion budget in the department’s Main Estimate, and the £1.6 billion of ‘other expenditure’ by the Education Funding Agency (EFA), identified in the July Memorandum to the Education Select Committee.

The £4 billion identified in the Main Estimate relates to the department’s £4.7 billion capital budget, of which £4,115,299 is paid out via the EFA. This capital investment enables local authorities to discharge their duties: to ensure that there are enough school places; to maintain the school estate; to undertake major replacement and refurbishment projects for schools in the worst condition through the Priority Schools Building Programmes; and to facilitate education reform through the Free Schools programme.

The Memorandum to the Education Select Committee provides a breakdown of expenditure within the Estimate Lines. The EFA’s major programme budget includes an ‘other’ heading that totals £1.6 billion. This heading groups together the smaller school’s programmes, including Universal Infant Free School Meals, Private Finance Initiative funding, Post-16 Free School Meals, Post-16 Bursary Fund, and Post-16 Learner Support.

The academy schools net expenditure totals £17 billion for programme and capital, the majority being for resource expenditure.

8th Jul 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the new guidance for postgraduate teacher training issued by the National College of Teaching and Leadership on (1) the viability of subject courses at secondary level, and (2) future teacher supply in secondary subjects at national and regional level; whether they plan to publish a detailed assessment; and if so, when.

The Department for Education uses the national Teacher Supply Model (TSM) to assess the need for initial teacher training (ITT) entrants each year.

School Direct is an opportunity for schools in all areas to recruit and train the teachers that they need. For 2016/17, the National College for Teaching and Leadership (NCTL) listened to feedback from schools and universities and responded to recruitment challenges by moving to a more open approach which will provide School Direct lead schools and ITT providers with greater flexibility to respond to local conditions.

The viability of individual courses at secondary level are down to a mixture of local and institutional circumstances, including the number of applicants and the degree to which ITT providers engage in School Direct in partnership with schools.

7th Jul 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they plan to publish their assessment of the impact on universities and schools of the new guidance for postgraduate teacher training issued by the National College of Teaching and Leadership.

The recruitment control numbers for postgraduate initial teacher training will be published by the National College for Teaching and Leadership before the UCAS teacher training portal opens for applications.

15th Jan 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what proportion of 17 year-olds in England are participating in education and training in fulfilment of the duty to participate set out in the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009, and what steps they are taking to maximise participation from September 2015 when the requirement to participate increases to the 18th birthday.

Young people who were aged 17 at the start of this academic year were covered by the first phase of raising the participation age (RPA) set out in the Education and Skills Act 2008. This required them to continue in education or training for one further year, to 27 June 2014. This cohort is therefore no longer under a duty to participate, although we expect that the vast majority of them will continue to participate this academic year.

Data showing the proportion of these young people participating in the current academic year will be published as part of the 16-18 participation statistical first release at the end of June.

Young people who were aged 16 at the start of this academic year will be under a duty to participate until their 18th birthday. We will encourage schools, colleges and training providers to ensure that young people are aware of this requirement.

In addition, local authorities have a duty to promote the effective participation in education and training of 16 and 17 year olds in their area with a view to ensuring that they fulfil the duty to participate.

We plan to invest £7.2 billion in 2014/15 to fund education and training places for 16 to 19-year-olds. The government has implemented a range of other measures to promote participation and help young people get the best possible start in life, including the reform of vocational education and the Youth Contract.

15th Jan 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they have considered whether it is appropriate that the requirement for an NVQ1 Care Qualification would prevent an experienced teacher with special needs training from working with elderly dementia patients if a back problem prevented that individual from demonstrating making a bed.

The Department does not set the standards/criteria for attainment of NVQ qualifications. This is the responsibility of the appropriate awarding bodies working in partnership with employers, employer representative bodies and sector skills council in the relevant sector. Any proposed revision to NVQ qualifications would be a matter for consideration by the awarding bodies with relevant employers, employer representative bodies and sector skills council.

There is no requirement in adult social care currently for a care worker to hold a specific qualification in order to work in this role. However, under the Care Quality Commission’s registration system, it is the responsibility of the social care employer to determine the range of duties undertaken by the care worker and to ensure they have the necessary training and skills for those duties.

Earl Howe
Deputy Leader of the House of Lords
11th Dec 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what cross-Government estimates they have made in 2016–17 departmental budgets for the extra cost of agency and contract staff of HMRC’s proposals on not allowing staff employed through agencies or contractors to claim tax relief on their travel and subsistence expenses.

No cross-government estimates have been made for the extra cost of agency and contract staff in 2016-17 departmental budgets, following the restriction of tax relief on travel and subsistence for workers engaged through an employment intermediary.


The changes are aimed at ensuring the tax system provides no individuals or business with an unfair advantage by preventing temporary workers, who are employed through employment intermediaries, and their employers, from benefiting for relief for home-to-work travel and subsistence expenses. This relief is not generally available to other workers who are employed directly or through temporary work contracts.

11th Dec 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what are their estimates for the extra cost of supply teachers of HMRC’s proposals on not allowing staff engaged through agencies to claim tax relief on their travel and subsistence expenses.

No estimates have been made for the extra cost of supply teachers following restrictions to tax relief on travel and subsistence expenses for those working through employment intermediaries. The planned changes will put supply teachers employed through an intermediary on the same terms as other supply teachers, either contracted directly, or through an agency contract.