Information between 4th August 2026 - 23rd October 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 2nd November 2026 Baroness Spielman (Conservative - Life peer) Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Trends in the level of people claiming Personal Independence Payment and Universal Credit. View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Spielman voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 135 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 138 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Spielman voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 138 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Spielman voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 155 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Spielman voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 164 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 163 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Spielman voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 125 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Spielman voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 165 |
|
15 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Spielman voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 109 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - ACAS Code of Practice on Time Off for Trade Union Duties and Activities - View Vote Context Baroness Spielman voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 52 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 56 Noes - 82 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Spielman voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 57 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 67 Noes - 168 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Spielman voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 168 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Spielman voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 153 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 173 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Spielman speeches from: Civil Service: Impartiality
Baroness Spielman contributed 1 speech (645 words) Thursday 17th September 2026 - Grand Committee Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
|
Baroness Spielman speeches from: Jobcentre Plus and National Careers Service: Merger
Baroness Spielman contributed 1 speech (19 words) Thursday 10th September 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Personal Independence Payment: Mental Health
Asked by: Baroness Spielman (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 13th August 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the number of Personal Independence Payment claimants citing mental health conditions in their claims. Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The information requested is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost. |
|
Personal Independence Payment
Asked by: Baroness Spielman (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 12th August 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to review the Personal Independence Payment eligibility criteria. Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The Timms Review, the first ever full review of PIP, was launched to ensure we have a system that supports disabled people to achieve better health, higher living standards and greater in-dependence, including through employment.
As part of this work, the Review is gathering evidence from a wide range of sources, including lived experience, expert insight, existing research and new data, to inform its analysis and recommendations.
The steering group published its interim report on 9 July, providing an update on its work to date, including an evidence pack and a summary of the Call for Evidence, which received over 38,000 responses.
The steering group is now moving towards designing and testing its recommendations for change, which will be published in a final report in the autumn.
|
|
Personal Independence Payment
Asked by: Baroness Spielman (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 12th August 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to reform the Personal Independence Payment. Answered by Baroness Sherlock - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The Timms Review, the first ever full review of PIP, was launched to ensure we have a system that supports disabled people to achieve better health, higher living standards and greater in-dependence, including through employment.
As part of this work, the Review is gathering evidence from a wide range of sources, including lived experience, expert insight, existing research and new data, to inform its analysis and recommendations.
The steering group published its interim report on 9 July, providing an update on its work to date, including an evidence pack and a summary of the Call for Evidence, which received over 38,000 responses.
The steering group is now moving towards designing and testing its recommendations for change, which will be published in a final report in the autumn.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
17 Sep 2026, 3:05 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "of noble lords, including Baroness Faulkner and Baroness Spielman, who raised the " Speaker 18 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
19 Oct 2026, 8:22 p.m. - House of Lords "and the noble Lady Baroness Spielman isn't here for the debate this evening, but she has argued " Baroness Smith of Malvern, Minister of State (Education) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Thursday 17th September 2026
Declarations of interest - Declarations of interests for members of the Numeracy for Life Committee Numeracy for Life Committee Found: Richmond Project *Appointed to the Committee by the House of Lords on 1 July 2026 replacing Baroness Spielman |