Renters’ Rights Bill

Debate between Baroness Taylor of Stevenage and Lord Northbrook
Monday 28th April 2025

(1 week, 3 days ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage Portrait Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I think it is best to wait until I have the detail of the Serco arrangement before we debate that. As I said, I will give noble Lords a response in writing and place a copy in the Library.

Lord Northbrook Portrait Lord Northbrook (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I listened carefully to the Minister’s encouraging remarks on improving capacity and resources, and on the digitisation process. However, the impact assessment—if I have read it correctly—says there was no extra expenditure on this. I am not quite sure how to square the circle on that.

Baroness Taylor of Stevenage Portrait Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab)
- Hansard - -

As I said, we are working very closely with our colleagues in the Ministry of Justice and the courts service. The digitisation process is already under way and is already costed, and we are looking at other impacts. If the noble Lord’s view is that they are not clearly set out in the impact statement, I will come back to noble Lords on what they may be.

Renters’ Rights Bill

Debate between Baroness Taylor of Stevenage and Lord Northbrook
Tuesday 22nd April 2025

(2 weeks, 2 days ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Northbrook Portrait Lord Northbrook (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the Minister deal with the points made by the noble Lord, Lord Carrington, about institutional investors and their reluctance to invest when there is a minimum tenancy of only two months, and about lenders who are not prepared to lend to the sector? Does she feel that the institutional investors are an important part of the sector or are they not relevant?

Baroness Taylor of Stevenage Portrait Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I responded to that in an answer I gave to the noble Lord, Lord Young, at Question Time. Yes, institutional investors are important, but it is important that we do not create an idea that these are two-month fixed tenancies; they absolutely are not. They are assured tenancies with a two-month notice period on the part of the tenant. Most tenants will not want to take up a tenancy and go through all the procedures they will need to—as I set out—just to have a tenancy for two months and then leave it. Most tenants want a long-term tenancy where the landlord maintains their property and they pay their rent on time. That is how the system works. I do not think it will deter institutional investors from having the confidence they should rightly have in investing in build to rent, or any other form of rental investment, as a good investment. It is a steady source of income and, with a tenant with an assured tenancy, they will be more assured of that, not less.

Lord Northbrook Portrait Lord Northbrook (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I apologise; I failed to declare my interest as a private landlord of rental property in Hampshire.