(6 years, 10 months ago)
Lords Chamber Baroness Warsi
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Baroness Warsi 
        
    
        
    
        My Lords, with the leave of the House, I rise in the gap before the Front-Benchers speak to explain a material point that was raised in my speech. I have sought the permission of the Front-Benchers and the clerk. I said that the definition proposed by the APPG emerged from a wide-ranging consultation involving politicians, lawyers, academics and victims’ groups. An issue has been raised about who did not give evidence to that APPG inquiry. I want to make it clear that the call for evidence was an open call. It was widely publicised. The APPG did not make a decision about who would and would not be heard. Anybody who submitted written evidence was acknowledged in the report, whether or not the parliamentarians agreed with that submission, anybody who asked to come to give oral evidence was given the opportunity to do so and parliamentarians from both Houses were given the opportunity to come along to take part in those evidence sessions.
 Lord Singh of Wimbledon
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Singh of Wimbledon 
        
    
        
    
        My Lords, while evidence was accepted, not all evidence was agreed in the definition.