To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Thu 09 Feb 2017
Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting)

"The hon. Gentleman has mentioned many times the potential for class action, particularly in the US, on various issues. Does he not believe that having the word “reasonable” twice in the new clause that he has tabled actually becomes a licence for class action, rather than closing it down?..."
Lord Mackinlay of Richborough - View Speech

View all Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting)

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Thu 09 Feb 2017
Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

"On that point, may I ask what the sponsoring employer’s position would be under a pause order? Would the sponsoring employer be in contravention of his auto-enrolment obligations, having been forced to stop paying towards a master trust that is set up or is part of the employees’ contributions arrangements?

…..."

Lord Mackinlay of Richborough - View Speech

View all Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Thu 09 Feb 2017
Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

"I can understand the laudable aims of the hon. Member for Stockton North, but where such boards have had member participation, the reality has not always been a fantastic success. I had an oblique interest in the Maxwell pensions fiasco because I belonged to a firm of chartered accountants appointed …..."
Lord Mackinlay of Richborough - View Speech

View all Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Thu 09 Feb 2017
Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

"I do not disagree with what the hon. Gentleman says; ultimately, it is the employees’ funds, and it is important that they should take the greatest interest in them. I think that employee involvement in occupational schemes has generally been worthy and a great success, but I am more concerned …..."
Lord Mackinlay of Richborough - View Speech

View all Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Thu 09 Feb 2017
Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

"I thank my hon. Friend for outlining further the complexities of what the hon. Member for Stockton North is proposing. What we are looking for from master trusts is that they are well run, safe and that they actually perform for the pensioners of the future. With the greatest respect, …..."
Lord Mackinlay of Richborough - View Speech

View all Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Tue 07 Feb 2017
Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

"I do not want to stop the hon. Gentleman when he is in full flow—we are very much enjoying his oration about the effects of compounding and charges. Surely, as we have more master trusts and the auto-enrolment market gets bigger and bigger, it will be a natural feature of …..."
Lord Mackinlay of Richborough - View Speech

View all Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Tue 07 Feb 2017
Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

"I seek just one clarification from the Minister. Earlier today we agreed to Government amendment 3, which defined a scheme funder as

“a body corporate or a partnership that is a legal person”.

However, item 5 in the table of triggering events listed in clause 22(6) interprets a scheme funder …..."

Lord Mackinlay of Richborough - View Speech

View all Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Tue 07 Feb 2017
Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

"I am delighted to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Rosindell. I will probably say something more about my opposition to member trustees, which would be a step very much in the wrong direction, and I fear that the amendment tabled by the hon. Member for Stockton North would do that, …..."
Lord Mackinlay of Richborough - View Speech

View all Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Tue 07 Feb 2017
Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

"On the point about the person who promotes or markets the scheme, a lone employer or an employer thinking about his options, whether it be the National Employers Saving Trust or another master trust, may ask his independent financial adviser to consider which scheme is suitable for his business. How …..."
Lord Mackinlay of Richborough - View Speech

View all Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Pension Schemes Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 30 Jan 2017
Pension Schemes Bill [Lords]

"The House will be rather pleased that I will focus purely on the Bill, which I very much welcome and have no hesitation in supporting.

It may be helpful briefly to explain the framework and history of master trusts. Such pension plans were historically designed primarily for single employers, or …..."

Lord Mackinlay of Richborough - View Speech

View all Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Pension Schemes Bill [Lords]