British Industry and Services: Public Procurement Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

British Industry and Services: Public Procurement

Lord Spellar Excerpts
Tuesday 7th July 2026

(3 weeks, 4 days ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Asked by
Lord Spellar Portrait Lord Spellar
- Hansard - -

To ask His Majesty’s Government what is their policy on prioritising British industry and services when carrying out public procurement.

Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent Portrait The Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office (Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, on 26 March, the Government announced procurement reforms to protect our national security, boost growth and build a fairer economy. We have now moved from policy direction to delivery. As of last month, government departments can make use of the national security exemption in the Procurement Act 2023, where relevant. We also introduced a public interest test for departments to formally assess whether their services can be delivered more effectively in-house and have requested all government departments to develop insourcing plans.

Lord Spellar Portrait Lord Spellar (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I thank my noble friend the Minister for that reply, but that memo is not getting through to government departments. Time and again, they are giving preference to firms and workforces from overseas rather than British industry and services. We talk a lot in this House about government as regulator, government as legislator and government as policymaker. Is it not time for the role of government as customer to come forward so that we can re-industrialise Britain, as has been made very clear by the incoming Prime Minister? Can she get through to her department and the Treasury that there is a new sheriff in town, and we want to see a rapid change of direction?