To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 12 Mar 2024
Haiti

Speech Link

View all Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Haiti

Written Question
Northern Ireland Protocol
Tuesday 12th March 2024

Asked by: Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated - Life peer)

Question to the Northern Ireland Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Caine on 4 March and with regard to paragraphs 54 and 65 of the relevant Supreme Court judgment, whether they can confirm that the inconsistency between the Acts of Union and the protocol was not at issue before the Supreme Court because the Government did not lodge any cross appeal from the Court of Appeal’s decision that such inconsistency existed.

Answered by Lord Caine - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Supreme Court clearly set out in its judgement of 8 February 2023 the issues it considered and its reasoning for reaching the conclusions it did.

The Government’s consistent position on these matters is set out in the Safeguarding the Union Command Paper, which is that the Windsor Framework (which replaced the old Protocol) applies entirely consistently with Northern Ireland’s constitutional position within the United Kingdom, including as expressed in the relevant statute today.


Division Vote (Lords)
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hoey (None) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 193
Division Vote (Lords)
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hoey (None) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated No votes vs 3 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 199
Division Vote (Lords)
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hoey (None) voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 192
Division Vote (Lords)
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hoey (None) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 6 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 189
Scheduled Event - Tuesday 5th March
View Source
Lords - Oral questions - Main Chamber
Number of women who have been prosecuted for non-payment of the television licence in the past two years
MP: Baroness Hoey
Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 05 Mar 2024
TV Licence Non-payment: Women

Speech Link

View all Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: TV Licence Non-payment: Women

Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 05 Mar 2024
TV Licence Non-payment: Women

Speech Link

View all Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: TV Licence Non-payment: Women

Division Vote (Lords)
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hoey (None) voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 167