To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Lords)
7 Feb 2023 - Public Order Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Allen of Kensington (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 239 Noes - 248
Division Vote (Lords)
7 Feb 2023 - Public Order Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Allen of Kensington (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 129 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 209
Division Vote (Lords)
7 Feb 2023 - Public Order Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Allen of Kensington (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 254
Division Vote (Lords)
25 Jan 2023 - Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Allen of Kensington (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 99 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 193
Division Vote (Lords)
25 Jan 2023 - Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Allen of Kensington (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 87 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 176
Division Vote (Lords)
25 Jan 2023 - Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Allen of Kensington (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 114 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 206
Written Question
Business: Regulation
Monday 23rd January 2023

Asked by: Lord Allen of Kensington (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Callanan on 17 November 2022 (HL3179), what was the rationale for the decision to abolish the one-in-three-out policy.

Answered by Lord Callanan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)

The Government does not think a one-in-three-out rule is consistent with delivering world-class regulation to support the economy in adapting to a new wave of technological revolution or to achieving net zero.

We absolutely want to reduce costs to business wherever we sensibly can, though we intend to do that by looking at the merits of each case rather than using a one-in, three-out system.


Written Question
Housing: Energy
Monday 23rd January 2023

Asked by: Lord Allen of Kensington (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Callanan on 17 November (HL3182), what arrangements they have put in place to ensure that those who (1) do not have the digital literacy skills, and (2) are without internet access, can access the same impartial and tailored advice that users of the digitally led service can receive.

Answered by Lord Callanan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)

The Government has provided a digital assist service for the energy advice tool on GOV.UK for those without digital literacy skills or internet access. Later this year, we will provide further support through a free retrofit phoneline for consumers in England to access tailored and impartial information about how to improve the energy performance of their homes. In addition, the Government will launch a series of local demonstrator projects, which will test various approaches to delivering in-person advice, with a particular focus on harder-to-treat properties and digitally excluded consumer groups. Lessons learnt from these projects will inform further action post-2025.


Written Question
Migrant Workers: Skilled Workers
Monday 23rd January 2023

Asked by: Lord Allen of Kensington (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Murray of Blidworth on 21 December 2022 (HL4133), when they expect the Migration Advisory Committee to restart their review of the Shortage Occupation List; and when they expect the Committee to report.

Answered by Lord Murray of Blidworth

The Government is considering its position on the topic of legal migration following the Office for National Statistics’ November publication of net migration estimates and in line with its manifesto commitments to bring overall numbers down. We will be setting out information on the Shortage Occupation List review shortly.


Written Question
Migrant Workers: Skilled Workers
Monday 23rd January 2023

Asked by: Lord Allen of Kensington (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Murray of Blidworth on 21 December 2022 (HL4133), what changes they are considering to the workplan of the Migration Advisory Committee; and when they expect to publish changes to the workplan.

Answered by Lord Murray of Blidworth

The Government is considering its position on the topic of legal migration following the Office for National Statistics’ November publication of net migration estimates and in line with its manifesto commitments to bring overall numbers down. We will be setting out information on the Shortage Occupation List review shortly.