To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
British Nationality: Females
Wednesday 19th January 2022

Asked by: Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the Home Office on 27 January 2021 (UIN 139991), what assessment they have made of the protected characteristics of those deprived of citizenship; and what plans they have, if any, to collect and publish the data on this.

Answered by Baroness Williams of Trafford - Shadow Chief Whip (Lords)

In order for deprivation on ‘conducive to the public good’ grounds to be a consideration, the starting point is an individual’s conduct, that the individual is a terrorist or an extremist, or involved in espionage, war crimes, serious organised crime or similarly dangerous activities, in order to meet the ‘conducive to the public good’ test.

Figures for numbers of conducive deprivation orders, which are made under Section 40(2) of the 1981 British Nationality Act, have been published as part of the HM Government Transparency Report: Disruptive and Investigatory Powers. Four reports have been published to date in 2015, 2017, 2018 and 2020.

Figures are provided on an annual basis and we do not break those figures down further into sub-categories.


Written Question
British Nationality
Wednesday 19th January 2022

Asked by: Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask Her Majesty's Government when information relating to the use of deprivation of citizenship orders under section 40(2) of the British Nationality Act 1981 in (1) 2019, (2) 2020, and (3) 2021, will be published.

Answered by Baroness Williams of Trafford - Shadow Chief Whip (Lords)

Figures for numbers of conducive deprivation orders, which are made under Section 40(2) of the 1981 British Nationality Act, have been published as part of the HM Government Transparency Report: Disruptive and Investigatory Powers. Four reports have been published to date in 2015, 2017, 2018 and 2020 which provide the number of deprivation of citizenship orders made up until the end of 2018.

A further publication which includes the more recent data is due to be published shortly.


Written Question
British Nationality
Wednesday 19th January 2022

Asked by: Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many people were deprived of their citizenship under section 40(2) of the British Nationality Act 1981 for each year from 2010 to 2018, broken down by (1) the grounds upon which those deprivation orders were made, (2) whether or not the individual had previously been granted refugee status, discretionary leave or humanitarian protection in the UK, (3) whether or not the individual was under the age of 18, and (4) whether the individual was in the UK at the time of the deprivation.

Answered by Baroness Williams of Trafford - Shadow Chief Whip (Lords)

Figures for numbers of conducive deprivation orders, which are made under Section 40(2) of the 1981 British Nationality Act, have been published as part of the HM Government Transparency Report: Disruptive and Investigatory Powers. Four reports have been published to date in 2015, 2017, 2018 and 2020 which provide the number of deprivation of citizenship orders made up until the end of 2018.

Year

Number of Individuals

2010

5

2011

6

2012

5

2013

8

2014

4

2015

5

2016

14

2017

104

2018

21


Figures are provided on an annual basis and we do not break those figures down further into sub-categories.


Written Question
British Nationality
Wednesday 19th January 2022

Asked by: Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many appeals against deprivation of citizenship orders under section 40(2) of the British Nationality Act 1981 have been made in each of the last five years; and how many of those appeals were upheld.

Answered by Baroness Williams of Trafford - Shadow Chief Whip (Lords)

Figures for numbers of conducive deprivation orders, which are made under Section 40(2) of the 1981 British Nationality Act (BNA 1981), have been published as part of the HM Government Transparency Report: Disruptive and Investigatory Powers. Four reports have been published to date in 2015, 2017, 2018 and 2020 which provide the number of deprivation of citizenship orders made up until the end of 2018.

Figures are provided on an annual basis and we do not break those figures down further into sub-categories. However, data on the number of people who appealed against a deprivation of British citizenship decision under both Section 40(2) and 40(3) of the BNA 1981 has been published. The table shows a breakdown by year of appeals lodged between 05/03/2011 and 31/12/2018 against deprivation decisions and orders.

Year

No of people who lodged an appeal

2011

5

2012

5

2013

10

2014

29

2015

37

2016

41

2017

37

2018

88

Total

252

The following notes should be considered when viewing this data:

  1. These statistics have been taken from a live operational database. As such, numbers may change as information on that system is updated.
  2. Data extracted on 17/05/2021.
  3. Date relates to the number of people who lodged an appeal between 05/03/2011 and 31/12/2018 against a decision made on a deprivation case.
  4. Data relates to main applicants only.

A number of the appeals in relation to deprivations under Section 40(2) of the BNA 1981 are ongoing. Therefore, we are unable to provide a partial figure of upheld appeals whilst litigation is ongoing.


Written Question
British Nationality
Wednesday 19th January 2022

Asked by: Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the number of people in each of the last five years who would have been deprived of their citizenship if there had been no requirement to give prior notification.

Answered by Baroness Williams of Trafford - Shadow Chief Whip (Lords)

Prior to the recent High Court decision in the case of D4, the relevant regulations governing service of notice in deprivation cases, provided adequately for a variety of situations, meaning that there had been no cases where the notification requirement had prevented deprivation action from taking place.


Speech in Lords Chamber - Wed 05 Jan 2022
Nationality and Borders Bill

"My Lords, I shall concentrate on the subject that I know best because I reviewed it for the Home Office in 2016: the deprivation of citizenship, covered in that late addition to the Bill, Clause 9. The phrase has a Cold War feel to it: we think of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, …..."
Lord Anderson of Ipswich - View Speech

View all Lord Anderson of Ipswich (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Nationality and Borders Bill

Speech in Grand Committee - Tue 30 Nov 2021
Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011 (Continuation) Order 2021

"As Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation in 2016, I had no hesitation in recommending the second renewal of TPIMs in that year. I share the Government’s view that TPIMs, although they involve a particularly severe deprivation of liberty and intrusion into private life, may be an appropriate tool for dealing …..."
Lord Anderson of Ipswich - View Speech

View all Lord Anderson of Ipswich (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011 (Continuation) Order 2021

Speech in Lords Chamber - Wed 27 Oct 2021
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

"My Lords, I put my name to Amendment 106A, which the noble Lord, Lord Rosser, has just introduced thoroughly and persuasively. Although I have sat as a part-time judge in crime for many years now, I freely admit that I do not have the depth of background in this field …..."
Lord Anderson of Ipswich - View Speech

View all Lord Anderson of Ipswich (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 09 Feb 2021
Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill

"My Lords, I shall speak to Motions A, C and E on the basis that each of them relates in some way to an earlier amendment in my name.

Motion A concerns Amendment 1, which I originally moved in Committee. Like the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, I would have preferred …..."

Lord Anderson of Ipswich - View Speech

View all Lord Anderson of Ipswich (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 01 Feb 2021
Domestic Abuse Bill

"My Lords, I have put my name to Amendments 81, 83 and 84. I addressed Amendment 81 when speaking to Amendments 72 and 73 in the last group. The Minister suggested in response that there were certain circumstances in which it might be appropriate to impose a drugs or alcohol …..."
Lord Anderson of Ipswich - View Speech

View all Lord Anderson of Ipswich (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Domestic Abuse Bill