All 2 Debates between Lord Ashton of Hyde and Baroness Hollis of Heigham

Tax Credits: Impact of Cuts

Debate between Lord Ashton of Hyde and Baroness Hollis of Heigham
Monday 14th September 2015

(8 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Ashton of Hyde Portrait Lord Ashton of Hyde
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I did not know that they had risen that fast. The former Chancellor, Alistair Darling, said that tax credits were never intended to subsidise lower wages. However, the current Chancellor has been very careful not to claim that tax credits have depressed wages. The fact is that we want to increase people’s wages. We introduced the national living wage and we want people to keep more of what they earn, rather than subsidising people through the benefits system.

Baroness Hollis of Heigham Portrait Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, is the Minister aware that, despite his statistics, the majority of children in poverty have parents in work? It is therefore not true to say that work is the best route out of poverty unless that pay is topped up by tax credits. Otherwise, a single person and a family get the same wage. Tax credits lift children out of poverty. Can we therefore hope that the Minister will take that information back to the Treasury so that, when we face the battle over welfare reform cuts, alleviating child poverty is at the heart of this House’s attack on poverty?

Lord Ashton of Hyde Portrait Lord Ashton of Hyde
- Hansard - -

The noble Baroness is well respected for her mastery of the detail in this reform. We will address child poverty comprehensively in the Welfare Reform and Work Bill. I am sure that the noble Baroness will be involved in that. We still think that work is the best route out of poverty. The number of children growing up in workless families is at a record low, down by 390,000 in the last Parliament. We are particularly trying to help those on the lowest incomes. Families will still be able to earn up to £3,850 before the awards are taken away.

Low Pay: Resolution Foundation Report

Debate between Lord Ashton of Hyde and Baroness Hollis of Heigham
Tuesday 11th November 2014

(9 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Ashton of Hyde Portrait Lord Ashton of Hyde
- Hansard - -

I am not in a position to answer that but I will write to my noble friend.

Baroness Hollis of Heigham Portrait Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, in his Answer the noble Lord commented that the Government had ensured for people the security of a weekly wage. How does he ally that with the growth in zero-hours contracts, when more than 1.5 million people do not know on Friday what hours—and, therefore, what earnings—they will get on Monday?

Lord Ashton of Hyde Portrait Lord Ashton of Hyde
- Hansard - -

We have looked at the position of zero-hours contracts. We think that all workers, regardless of the type of contract they have, are entitled to core rights. We think that the flexibility offered by zero-hours contracts will suit some workers. Interestingly, the research from the CIPD found that those on zero-hours contracts say that they are equally satisfied with their job, but we are going to deal with some criticisms and problems with zero-hours contracts, such as exclusivity clauses and lack of transparency. That will be dealt with very soon in the business Bill.