Debates between Lord Ashton of Hyde and Lord Tyrie during the 2019 Parliament

Lord Ashton of Hyde Portrait The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Ashton of Hyde) (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I must inform the Committee that if Amendment 85 is agreed to, I will not be able to call Amendments 86 and 87 by reason of pre-emption.

Lord Tyrie Portrait Lord Tyrie (Non-Afl)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I have a couple of amendments in the group on which I would like to speak. They are only dimly related, although I have started to think about ways of connecting them for the purposes of making things vaguely interesting and coherent to the Committee. It is a fairly hotchpotch grouping on that account.

The first amendment I will speak to is on the review of the CAT that I propose. The Competition Appeal Tribunal is a crucial part of the UK’s competition machinery. Its legal work is highly respected and adds credibility to the framework of law in the area as a whole. High-quality legal scrutiny gives firms confidence that they will be treated fairly. From an international perspective, fairness before the law is arguably the UK’s biggest single asset, well ahead of several others often discussed, such as the nexus of high-quality consultancies, top-flight accounting, the attraction of London as a location, time zones, language and even golf courses, which sometimes get a mention.