Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 05 Jan 2026
Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill
"My Lords, it might help the House if I were to provide a brief overview of the International Relations and Defence Committee’s recent report, which my noble friend Lord Callanan referred to, on Chagossian views on the agreement concerning the Chagos Archipelago. What I will cover touches on many of …..."Lord De Mauley - View Speech
View all Lord De Mauley (Con - Excepted Hereditary) contributions to the debate on: Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill
Division Vote (Lords)
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill -
View Vote Context
Lord De Mauley (Con) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
82 Conservative Aye votes vs
0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 131 Noes - 127
Division Vote (Lords)
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill -
View Vote Context
Lord De Mauley (Con) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
101 Conservative Aye votes vs
0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 132 Noes - 124
Division Vote (Lords)
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill -
View Vote Context
Lord De Mauley (Con) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
138 Conservative Aye votes vs
0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 130
Division Vote (Lords)
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill -
View Vote Context
Lord De Mauley (Con) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
149 Conservative Aye votes vs
0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 178
Division Vote (Lords)
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill -
View Vote Context
Lord De Mauley (Con) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
148 Conservative Aye votes vs
0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 131
Division Vote (Lords)
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill -
View Vote Context
Lord De Mauley (Con) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
201 Conservative Aye votes vs
0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 220
Division Vote (Lords)
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill -
View Vote Context
Lord De Mauley (Con) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
193 Conservative Aye votes vs
0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 223
Written Question
Wednesday 26th November 2025
Asked by:
Lord De Mauley (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)
Question
to the Ministry of Defence:
To ask His Majesty's Government to what extent the Veterans Strategy, published on 10 November, applies to reservists.
Answered by Lord Coaker
- Minister of State (Ministry of Defence)
The Veterans' Strategy applies to all those who have previously served in HM Forces, Regular and Reserve. The Strategy is an important milestone in this government's work to renew the UK's contract with those who serve and have served.
It resets the narrative around the remarkable men and women who have served in our Armed Forces, ensuring all veterans' service is celebrated, their potential to make further contributions is realised and, for those that need it, that the right support is available to them.
The strategy is aligned with key Ministry of Defence priorities, the Strategic Defence Review and the extension of the Armed Forces Covenant, together with the government's wider Plan for Change.
Division Vote (Lords)
24 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill -
View Vote Context
Lord De Mauley (Con) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
184 Conservative Aye votes vs
0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 244