23 Lord Fowler debates involving the Department for Transport

Mon 23rd Oct 2017
Space Industry Bill [HL]
Lords Chamber

Committee: 3rd sitting (Hansard): House of Lords
Mon 24th Oct 2016
Bus Services Bill [HL]
Lords Chamber

Report: 2nd sitting (Hansard - part one): House of Lords

Space Industry Bill [HL]

Lord Fowler Excerpts
Relevant documents: 1st and 2nd Reports from the Delegated Powers Committee and 2nd Report from the Constitution Committee
Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker (Lord Fowler)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, it might be for the convenience of the House if those who are not engaged in the Space Industry Bill would like to leave at this point before we go on.

Clauses 50 to 59 agreed.

Bus Services Bill [HL]

Lord Fowler Excerpts
Report: 2nd sitting (Hansard - part one): House of Lords
Monday 24th October 2016

(7 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Bus Services Act 2017 View all Bus Services Act 2017 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: HL Bill 58-II(Rev) Manuscript amendment for Report (PDF, 108KB) - (24 Oct 2016)
Amendment 24 not moved.
Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker (Lord Fowler)
- Hansard - -

I should inform the House that if Amendment 25 is agreed, I cannot call Amendments 26 and 27 because of pre-emption.

Amendment 25

Moved by

Railways: Investment

Lord Fowler Excerpts
Thursday 25th November 2010

(13 years, 5 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Earl Attlee Portrait Earl Attlee
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, with regard to the noble Lord’s kind words about the difference between this place and another place, I could not possibly comment. The noble Lord talked about electrification out to Bristol. That is an important point. As I said, it is closely linked to the IEP solution and the development of the business case. He talked about a possible contribution from the Welsh Assembly Government. I think that he is thinking along the correct lines. I will talk to the officials and reflect on his points about overcrowding. The decision regarding fares was difficult, but we have to get some more income to pay for the improvements. However, it is certainly not a mechanism to choke off demand and passengers. We want people to travel by rail; we do not want them to travel by car.

Lord Fowler Portrait Lord Fowler
- Hansard - -

My Lords, is the Minister aware that the government Statement that he has made is important and will be widely welcomed throughout the country, not just in London but in many other parts as well? Is it not sensible, even in these times of austerity, that plans for capital investment should go ahead and be sustained? In the past, it has been the case that capital projects have been cut back. That is one of the most significant parts of the Statement. I underline the importance of the high-speed service to Birmingham; it is important not just to Birmingham but to commerce, industry and business in the whole of the West Midlands. I hope that he will take it that there is a great deal of support for that new service.

Earl Attlee Portrait Earl Attlee
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, it is an important Statement. I also look forward to making further welcome Statements about the development of our railway system. My noble friend is right about capital investment; we are spending for future growth. He talked about the benefits of High Speed 2 for the Midlands, but it would also give benefits much further north.