House of Lords Reform Bill [HL]

Debate between Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market and Earl of Caithness
Friday 21st October 2011

(14 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Share Debate
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market Portrait Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market
- Hansard -
-

The amendment says “under section” but there is no section. Therefore, it falls if Amendment 128 is not agreed to.

Earl of Caithness Portrait The Earl of Caithness
- Hansard -
- - Excerpts

My Lords, I apologise. I am absolutely certain that my noble friend Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market is right. This shows the slight confusion that we are in as a result of the earlier Motion. Therefore, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.

Return to start of debate - Return to top of page