All 1 Debates between Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market and Lord Sanderson of Bowden

Thu 2nd Feb 2012

Scotland Bill

Debate between Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market and Lord Sanderson of Bowden
Thursday 2nd February 2012

(12 years, 3 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Sanderson of Bowden Portrait Lord Sanderson of Bowden
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I strongly support both my noble friend’s amendment and that of the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes. I should perhaps declare an interest. I have two grandchildren, both aged 17. One is at school in Scotland and has been offered a place at Cambridge. The other is at school in England, lives in England and has been offered a place, conditional on her A-level results, at Edinburgh University.

Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market Portrait Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market
- Hansard - -

I may have a potential interest that I did not declare. I have grandchildren living in England who may wish to go to a Scottish university.

Lord Sanderson of Bowden Portrait Lord Sanderson of Bowden
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In my case, no doubt everyone will realise that the grandfather will have to pay. That is one part of it. I strongly support what my noble friend Lord Maclennan said when he asked my noble and learned friend on the Front Bench to take this matter away, consider it carefully and come back with an answer that will give us some satisfaction.

The question was asked earlier in this very good debate: do we want this sort of devolution? For my money, I think not—and I certainly know by the amount of disquiet in Scotland over this matter that there is concern that this must be sorted out. It should not be within the power of the present Scottish Government to exercise power in this way, with discrimination writ all over it in big letters. We must think of another way of dealing with this. I realise that legally they are quite correct, but morally they are not. If they want to try to divide the United Kingdom, this is the way to go about it—and frankly I dislike it intensely. It goes to the heart of the argument over whether the United Kingdom should be broken up. I sincerely hope that the two amendments in this group will start a debate in this House and outside it, as my noble friend Lord Maclennan said, and that the Minister will listen carefully and realise the anger that exists up and down the country over this discriminatory measure.